pull down to refresh
37 sats \ 4 replies \ @south_korea_ln OP 19 Nov \ parent \ on: Carbon emissions of writing and illustrating are lower for AI than for humans science
It's in Scientific Reports, the pay-to-publish journal of the Nature family. They likely paid ~2500 dollars to get this in. Good incentive for the journal to be less selective on what gets accepted by the Editor for further review. And after that, it just takes 2-3 not too negative reports by the referees to get it published.
Interesting. I didn't know there was a pay-to-publish arm of Nature. Maybe I should try to get an article in lol
reply
I only found out recently as we were looking to see if a "negative results" journal exists in physics. ChatGPT recommended this one :) We didn't go for it though, so no personal experience with it, and thus can't compare if the process is actually easier than with their more legit Nature or Nature Physics journals.
reply
I work in a business school so most people don't publish in Nature and aren't familiar with these nuances. I think if I could get one in, people would automatically be super impressed, even if it's "Scientific Reports" lol.
reply
That's part of the appeal they're banking on.
Well now you know what to spend your next salary on ;)
reply