This is a thread for random discussions that gets posted everyday at 5am central.
Tell us what you're doing today, ask questions, or vent about your life. Whatever you want, let it rip!
pull down to refresh
pull down to refresh
This is a thread for random discussions that gets posted everyday at 5am central.
Tell us what you're doing today, ask questions, or vent about your life. Whatever you want, let it rip!
Quick suggested feature: When someone makes a dup, it should cost more sats that go to SN. E.g. 21 sats.
Like it should still be possible to post dup, but it should cost more ;)
Good idea!
deleted by author
Also, is there a way to see yesterday's Daily discussion? @k00b
Added. There's now a link to 'yesterday' below the title.
deleted by author
Not currently. I can add it though
deleted by author
deleted by author
deleted by author
@k00b is there a plan to add search functionality to the site?
Yes! I'm hoping to introduce search in the next couple of weeks - because I want search too. What do you find yourself wanting to search for?
What do you think about adding a predefined set of tags for categorizing/filtering posts? Things like
bitcoin,lightning,meta,cryptographyoramacould be tags that you can click to see posts filtered by tag like in lobste.rsThat's not a bad idea. The problem is whether that should exist alongside subs or not - because we do eventually want subs.
A nice thing about tags over subs is that one post can have many, so there is more metadata about posts and you can have kind-of subs by filtering tags by URL. so for instance the stacker.news/tags/bitcoin would contain only posts with the
bitcointag or you could have an aggregated sub that has multiple tags like stacker.news/tags/bitcoin,cryptography Even posts could be tagged with #bitcoin for instance, adding metadata to posts for better searches.Don't you get the same thing from posts cross-posted to subs? AFAIK you can't browse
/r/bitcoin,cryptographyon reddit, but we could allow such a thing.With cross-post you make another publication I think, this approach keeps discussion and tips in the thread posted by OP and not a cross publication. /r/bitcoin,cryptography would give you posts tagged either Bitcoin or cryptography so you can curate your news list based on interests.
I see. Hrmmmm maybe we can do a hybrid approach and it doesn't create a new post but just uses the same one.
I also think it should probably cost 1 sat for every 'sub' or 'tag' that you add.
deleted by author
deleted by author
deleted by author
deleted by author
deleted by author
deleted by author
deleted by author
I choose vent.
The Wikipedia poll bothers me quite a bit. I posted a desperate idea on stacker news last night. Didn't get any upvotes. It was probably dumb or it wasn't the right forum.
I don't know what to do, but I feel like wanting bitcoin to succeed and wanting global warming to stop is in conflict...so I'm forced to choose a camp.
Even if wiki stops accepting it, they may start accepting it later again. This is just one small battle...
In argument like this it's useful to realize that you are actually not fighting the people that are the most against the idea, but rather you are talking with reason to people that are in between and are willing to learn. It's worth adjusting the tone and arguments for that.
It's symbolic. And a data point. It's like "The environmentalists are prepared to shoot themselves in the foot to stop bitcoin".
deleted by author
deleted by author
You've got some upvotes now.
There are many bitcoiners who agree with you on GW so you should at least know you aren't alone.
The best way I've found to think about bitcoin's energy usage is on a relative basis to other things that use energy. That wikipedia RFC states McDonald's toy production consumes more energy than bitcoin and clearly bitcoin is a less frivolous use of energy. Another energy stat is clothing dryers in the US alone consumer more energy than bitcoin.
imho the camp you have to choose isn't between bitcoin and the environment. It's between whether consuming energy for human flourishing is worth it or not.
deleted by author
It's not as one-sided as "Bitcoin is bad because it uses a lot of energy".
The legacy financial system is incredibly inefficient, if having to run Bitcoin alongside it for a while allows us to transition away from it eventually, then I'd say that's worth it in the long run.
Also, take a look at this:
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/business/bitcoin-mining-drives-clean-energy
and this (regarding the fiat financial system):
https://medium.com/galoymoney/lightning-as-a-retail-payment-system-part-1-7463c46342ef
deleted by author
deleted by author
deleted by author