pull down to refresh

Laurie Calhoon breaks down the attacks on free speech in her latest article.
"Now, there has always been government control of wartime narratives, said to be necessitated by national defense, or the safeguarding of democracy itself. During wartime, people who speak out in defiance of the government are typically denigrated as enemy sympathizers, if not traitors. Preposterously enough, profoundly undemocratic policies, such as the conscription of young men to don uniforms and fight against their will for causes which they do not regard as worthy of the sacrifice of their life, are sometimes championed by the leaders of otherwise democratic states during wartime. This self-contradiction arises because the government portrays every military conflict in which it engages as exceptional in the sense that the very existence of the state is allegedly at issue. The urgency and peril of the situation are claimed to necessitate extraordinary measures, above all, the restriction of citizens’ liberty in exchange for security."
In a public square conducive to open discourse among free people, individuals with diverse interests and opinions hash out ideas and prospective policies in order to determine which ones should prevail. In effect, this competition among ideas reflects the very process used to elect government officials in democratic states. The candidates are permitted to express their views and what they plan to do, and the voters then choose between the available options, however dismal, at the voting booth.
It is hard to see how these people even survive in the wilderness of society! Protect 'our' democracy by muzzling everybody, except us. Stop the spread of speaking truth to power! The 'majority' gets to stampede over the 'minority' rights. Take away all responsibilities to guarantee freedom. How can they deceive themselves through such untrue nonsense? Only open and free speech can solve the problems by working out the differences.
reply
Some even claim that we should destroy free speech in the name of “democracy.” We live under a police state regime that interferes in everything in people's lives
reply
On COVID:
Of particular note during this bizarre period of history was the ridicule of people who “did their own research” rather than act solely on faith that figures such as public health guru Dr. Anthony Fauci had unique access to the truth and were sincerely trying to protect them. Those who dared to suggest possible financial incentives among key players in forging the COVID-19 narrative—such as Bill Gates and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla—for maintaining a level of fear among the citizenry until every person on the planet was vaccinated were ridiculed and spurned as dangerous, even evil, “conspiracy theorists.”
Yeah, this hits me in the gut.
It's a good reminder that everyone has a little authoritarian inside them, just waiting for the right circumstances to come out. Even the supposedly free-thinking scientifically minded people, who I felt very betrayed by during COVID.
reply
My mother-in-law recently launched into a whole thing about how unfairly maligned Fauci is. This outburst was a complete tangent to the conversation that had been going on.
Something broke these people's brains and I think some are just not going to recover.
reply
Perhaps the jab broke their brains. It is breaking almost every other part of their bodies, so why not their brains. Their reasoning left them because of the mass media indoctrination. What can they do? They will not awaken when shaken.
reply
It was TDS that broke her brain.
reply
Ohhh............. we are seeing a lot of that lately on the internet!
reply