pull down to refresh

39 sats \ 4 replies \ @ek OP 17 Nov \ parent \ on: A Theory of Everything for Zaps? meta
Perhaps letting everybody know who is upzapping and who is downzapping would be beneficial.
I don't think so, see #770984
Perhaps a good place to start would be to figure out what behaviors you specifically want to incentivize
zapping
You could arrange so a person with multiple accounts could NOT zap amongst them.
How? We already know who is zapping who. We just don't show it for privacy reasons and we can't know for sure if the same person is behind some accounts unless we KYC everyone which we obviously don't want.
write
preview
17 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 17 Nov
We already know who is zapping who.
And that's why I zap mostly as anon.
reply
15 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 17 Nov
Another point is: does zapping come before incentives for other reasons or do other reasons come before zapping in the list of priorities? Where do you want more zapping? You could strengthen that on the leaderboard movement weighing
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 17 Nov
Aren’t there other behaviors that you want to encourage by the zapping? One of the problems with zapping is having enough to zap with. It is awfully tough for the nooby to zap when he does not have any sats to zap with. Perhaps arranging for some zaps to be more valuable on the leaderboard over others would encourage zapping. For instance, zapping a new bio, to get noobies going.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 17 Nov
zapping a new bio, to get noobies going.
Wrong ! I found many assmilkers posting a "pro-bitcoin" bio just to grab more sats in the beginning and later they change the whole bio and even the alias and start posting crap. Be aware not be assmilked!
Better is to let them show their true face, it will be very fast in their first posts. If you do not know well a stacker, always go back to see their first posts...
reply