pull down to refresh
214 sats \ 15 replies \ @Undisciplined 15 Nov \ on: What (in your opinion) would ruin SN? ideasfromtheedge
I think the most realistic one is a rapid influx of low quality stackers (could be woke, but could be something else).
A flood of obnoxious comments might drive away our thoughtful writers and whatever content gets elevated would be garbage.
when the Eternal September arrives, we will probably need citadels on SN
reply
What would that look like?
reply
reply
That clearly has a role, but wouldn't a first step be a mechanism to ban people from territories?
reply
reply
Maybe the real first step would just be customized posting fees that owners can set for individual stackers.
reply
reply
I agree! You know there are people who ask openly "how much you HODL?👀"
reply
God save the West
reply
But what do you mean by low quality? On what basis or filter can a comment or post be classified?
reply
It's in the eye of the beholder, but most of us feel like SN posts and comments are higher quality and that stackers are more thoughtful than what you generally find on the internet.
reply
It is certainly true, but we have all learned things from the Internet, right? Or have you learned everything from books? That is because SN gives us the opportunity to see different content and different comments, which helps us to have different types of points of view, right? And that makes this platform pluralistic and tolerant of all types of comments.
reply
No, we have downzapping specifically to deal with low quality content. Being pluralistic in no way implies being accepting of everything.
This is a value-for-value platform, which means comments and posts should be providing value to someone here.
reply
We totally agree on that, sorry if I misunderstood you.
reply
Thanks for sharing your opinion!
reply