pull down to refresh
309 sats \ 6 replies \ @IamSINGLE 15 Nov \ on: I finally muted someone on SN: how to achieve this dubious honor meta
It seems like you muted a highly trained Chatbot.
I Never had any conversation with it. I don't know but while looking at the profile I found interesting stats..
It has more than 1000 items, mostly very long replies, but the stacking shows only 37000 Sats. For 1000 items a real account would stack much more. I stacked around 200k for 1k items. I'm sure you (all top Stackers) would Stack much more.
While this is a serious crime of encroachment on free speech SN street, I kindly ask you to always take precautions (have a look at the profile) before indulging in love talks with a beautiful nym. (Ph).
Interesting. I never look at anyone's bio.
Chatbot or regular human NPC, I'm not surprised people weren't zapping those comments very much. They tended to be very tedious and repetitive. Most likely, the initial comment got zapped, but then stackers learned not to engage.
Your theory makes sense of why they weren't able to reference our past discussions, though.
reply
What I replied you took me 5 minutes but some of the replies I saw by it were so long that might've taken half an hour to a real person. Why would someone real do that without any monetary gains? I mean don't he have any job other than replying here?
I'm not technical like so many here so I go with simple methods. I never reply or zap someone new until I have a proper look at the bio and a history ...
By looking at those replies, I also found that the English used is not meant for conversation or it seems so.
reply
You cannot reference our past discussion which you claim to have found tedious and repetitive.
You make claims against me that you then fail to back, and now I am faulted for not referencing the evidence you have not provided?
Bizarre.
reply
I am not here for a circle jerking echo chamber.
I am not a chatbot.
You and OP can call me whatever you choose but my position remains I issued a challenge to engage on Libertarian theory debate and the OP refused to on the grounds that he found previous discussions unsatisfactory.
However I take exception to him accusing me of name calling in that dialogue when he was the only person in that exchange calling names.
reply
Let the Chatbot disconnected and I'm sure you won't be writing such long and tedious replies.
BTW, you'll also manage to get much higher zaps without the Chatbot.
reply
I come for the contest of ideas, not witch hunts, echo chamber circle jerking or personal attacks.
All my comments are written manually with no AI 'assistance'...I just put in some time and effort to contribute what hopefully is a considered and reasoned comment.
While receiving zaps is nice, do not want or expect a robust and honest contest of ideas to be a popularity contest or for monetary gain, although that is clearly how some see it.
BTW you are correct in one of your speculations several comment above - in that I do not need to work in the ordinary sense (9-5 or whatever) but rather have enough to live on from investments- tip- while you might discount the value of complex ideas and reasoned debate as 'tedious', in my experience they can be powerful tools and can result in considerable reward over time.
reply