pull down to refresh
One of the biggest gripes with chat bots is they're too verbose, so that's actually another use-case for AI reply bots is learning brevity and distilling information
A bot which can earn sats on SN and not get muted > a bot which passes the Turing test
Think about the internet in general, massive incentive exists to create an AI that consistently makes good content (revenue)
There are plenty of long conversations to train on, no?
I don't know. @elvismercury told me that AI's have already run out of original material to train on, so generating new material might have value.
Also, if this is for the purpose of sat farming, it would be worthwhile to learn how to prolong conversations.
so generating new material might have value.
I think there's also the problem with feedback loops regarding this.
If most content will be AI generated, AI will train on its own content mostly. I think that's a good reason why even AI people should want AI content to be flagged as AI.
That's the concern. Right now, they're having AI's generate new material for AI's to train on. At least this way there's presumably a human in the loop.
Model autophagy disorder (MAD), yea that's a real issue... bots that generate novel content through soliciting replies can be a type of cross-check
"Model autography disorder." Hadn't heard that, but it's something I've had to worry about before in a professional context. Nice to know it has a name!
Yea it's crazy to think bots are only going to be used reactively, even if they haven't yet scraped every piece of organic data that doesn't mean all the organic data remaining is free... sats on a message board might be a bargain
Wouldn't a reply generate longer conversations to train on?