pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 11 Nov \ parent \ on: deleted by author based
The global scientific communities overwhelming consensus is that we should be afraid. That we need to take urgent and collective action to prevent devastating changes in the climate. Libertarians prefer to deny all the science and evidence than accept a situation where government might have an essential role in preserving a safe global environment.
write
preview
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @mf 11 Nov
You mean the psycos dressed as doctors? There's virtually zero science being their claims.
Anyone with a pair of neurons should always deny "science" and "evidence", aka propaganda.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 11 Nov
All for healthy skepticism but not so much blind cynicism. The evidence is overwhelming that climate change is real and dangerous...and caused by humans.
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-66387537
https://www.popsci.com/environment/earths-oceans-heat-salt/
https://www.cbc.ca/news/science/ocean-hottest-on-record-1.6342636
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @mf 11 Nov
Great sources no doubt.
Correlation is not causation. I would recommend educating yourself about numbers and stats as a tool of deception and astronomical phenomena that could MAYBE rethink your faith in our cherished fiat science.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 11 Nov
The science of GHGs causing climate change is over 100 years old...and very firmly established. It is now demonstrable and evidenced in the world. The bounds of Libertarian denial of facts and science seems unlimited. Skepticism is healthy but cynicism can be blind and dangerous.
reply