a sub sub space would probably look like user.bob@bitcoin we wanted to avoid name collisions with traditional DNS which is why we chose this syntax
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @andy 11 Nov
what do you do for a sub sub space? user.subsubspace.subspace@space? the syntax just seems weird.
reply
do we even need sub sub spaces? what use cases do you have in mind?
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @andy 11 Nov
with this syntax, is there a way to distinguish between a subspace that was delegated via the spaces protocol or inside a zonefile that has been attached to the space?
but there are still going to be collisions with all TLD, right?
reply
sorry I mean we used this syntax to make it less confusing with any conflicts with other naming systems
reply
I agree this is an issue, but I don't know that I like the syntax you've chosen. Not sure what a good solution is though.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @andy 10 Nov
can a space have a . in it's name?
reply
no, it has the same rules as a traditional dns name
reply
since the inception of the internet no email addresses have been defined directly on the tld so practically no collisions sip-02 also attempts to make this as painless as possible to integrate even into mainstream resolvers