I remember just months ago people on SN and in the general public downplaying the effect crypto and its money would have on the elections… Well, now that many of the races have been settled with only a couple dozen or so to be called it's clear crypto is a big-time player now. They put their money where their mouth was and got the results they made clear they wanted. Lets also remember that this was bipartisan and bicameral before people thought they only funded one side!
pull down to refresh
20 sats \ 10 replies \ @grayruby 9 Nov 2024
Yeah that was me.
It’s a shame that some of the worst people in the world (crypto people) were able to buy off some of the other worst people in the world (politicians).
reply
50 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 9 Nov 2024
√shit²
reply
40 sats \ 8 replies \ @Cje95 OP 9 Nov 2024
There is a positive side to this all and that is going to be clarity. For to long we haven't had any and lets say that the clarity we get turns out is bad or causes issues at least we have a way to clearly address what went wrong if that makes sense. The whole thing being in the dark is just detrimental for everyone except regulators who get to roam unchecked
reply
0 sats \ 7 replies \ @grayruby 9 Nov 2024
Yeah I still don't buy the clarity line that the crypto people love to parrot. There was clarity, they just didn't like it because it would cost them a lot of money and not allow them to abuse retail investors. I have always said, if they didn't like the existing laws I have no problem with lobbying to change them, if they don't like the SEC and want to abolish it, then lobby to do that to. No problem. I do however have a problem with scammers and fraudsters using a "lack of clarity" as an excuse to not follow the rules everyone else is required to follow.
The crypto industry is a net negative for humanity. Nothing of value has come out of it that requires a blockchain. And now some of the worst people on the planet will get a free pass. Fortunately eventually crypto will just collapse into the dust bin of history but in the meantime we have to watch terrible humans enrich themselves exploiting others and dragging an honest project like Bitcoin down with them.
I am not trying to be an intolerant bitcoin maxi here where everything besides bitcoin is shit because I said so. I am open to the idea that something positive could come out of digital assets besides bitcoin and there are some nice ideas but nothing has yet because the incentive structure is totally fucked. Even eth people have been talking about this lately. The incentive structure is so skewed to try and get rich quick instead of building something valuable and sustainable. From what I have seen out of crypto, I don't know how any bitcoiner, who believes in the promise of Bitcoin as a tool for good and not just number go up, could possibly not be anticrypto.
reply
40 sats \ 6 replies \ @Cje95 OP 9 Nov 2024
Well I mean Gary has flip-floped on so much with both BTC and ETH. One of the best examples I have seen of a magic wand being used by Chairman Gensler is when Democratic Rep. Richie Torres brought up the conversation he had with the Chairman about a Pokemon Card and how he responded which you can see what Rep. Torres talks about here. This is the type of stuff that has to be cleaned up because it doesn't make a ton of sense.
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @grayruby 9 Nov 2024
So because Gensler doesn't like crypto and refused to be definitive about what constitutes a security you think that should give the industry a pass on scamming people and subverting the law?
It's really a terrible whataboutism. Gensler bad so crypto poor little oppressed industry. Both can be bad.
Your bags must be real heavy my friend.
reply
40 sats \ 3 replies \ @Cje95 OP 9 Nov 2024
Oh hell no it means that Congress needs to address it. People like Sen. Brown refused to hold any sort of markup for regulation of crypto in the Senate essentially keeping the status quo and thus leading to the SEC getting caught up in lawsuit hell. If the SEC had clear guidance I think they wouldn't be caught up in cases like Ripple, Coinbase, and Robinhood where honestly its not looking good for the SEC.
The judges have even talked about how the scope of the legislation that the SEC is relying on isn't very solid and Congress needs to either help them or give jurisdiction for some of it to others like the CFTC.
view all 3 replies
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nitter 9 Nov 2024 bot
https://xcancel.com/RepRitchie/status/1840753221481951683
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @LowK3y19 3 Dec 2024
Trump is the bitcoin boss
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @sangekrypto 9 Nov 2024
Well, now they've seen it for themselves, haven't they?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 9 Nov 2024
Moreno in Ohio!
reply