>The Bitcoin Trust

in a broad sense, yes, but it's not formalized in writing

>until the overlords co-opt those terms.

fuck that, just don't accept blindly their terminology 

if traditional language is to be used, i think The Bitcoin Trust is an appropriate description of what we are using. 

otherwise, i use Bitcoin by stacking and zapping sats, until the overlords co-opt those terms.

zapsammy

yes.
it's in the definition: *legal* meaning contract. 
you imply a contract is made, playing yourself.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/custody

Are you sure?

> **custody** */ˈkʌs.tə.di/*
>
> the legal right or duty to care for someone or something
>
> *https://dictionary.cambridge.org/pt/dicionario/ingles/custody*