0 sats \ 6 replies \ @ek 29 Sep 2022 \ parent \ on: SN release: make jobs great again meta
Also, such small, one-time jobs don't really fit the template to fill out when posting on ~jobs
write
preview
132 sats \ 5 replies \ @k00b OP 29 Sep 2022
True. I think there’s something there and we should support that.
Feel free to post it now though if you want.
reply
220 sats \ 3 replies \ @kevin 30 Sep 2022
Posting smaller "jobs" would make the jobs section extremely noisy and take away from the value of real job posts. Honestly I think a lot of people would stop visiting the page if it would will up with these smaller kinds of gigs. I know I would at least.
reply
11 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 30 Sep 2022
Yes, I also agree. "Tasks" sounds great as @k00b mentioned! Job is not the correct wording.
reply
11 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b OP 30 Sep 2022
That’s true. We could maybe provide tasks in another area.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @HODL 1 Oct 2022
Much better idea. Tasks should be a completely new category.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 30 Sep 2022
I started to dig deeper into this and have made some progress now.
Learned about media queries etc. yesterday
The effect of "before asking a question, you research more to not embarrass yourself", lol
reply