I don't think there's any reason to think of cc's as importantly different from a custodied sat with a withdraw delay. Eventually, they turn back into rewards sats.

There's some tiny arbitrage there, but it doesn't seem worth much effort to exploit. You'd be better off just gaming the rewards system.

I'm going to try ignoring cowboy credits to the best of my ability. I don't want to use anything other than Bitcoin. Nowadays I'm forced to use dollars or giftcards or visa in some situations, but that's only for a few minutes.

Not trying to get all "toxic Maxy" or anything, I think it's just a preference. I appreciate koob for not forcing the credits onto us, and hope you guys find fun and unique ways to play with them.

I agree. Stackers may not take this CC thing very positively.

Also, This will definitely slow down speed of SN adoption (which is still verh slow) to a halt.

Can you really pay territory rent with CCs? I actually haven't taken this all shift thing very seriously. But I can tell you that gaming the system won't be possible through an exchange of CCs with sats for it has a cost which is at least 30%.

Now thinking you have two accounts and one where you have parked CCs and on the other you use real Bitcoin, you still need to zap CCs which will take out 30% in fees.

The gaming of system won't be possible by any means.

I want to see how it will work. Hence why l am waiting. I want to at least try it for a while, so k00bs efforts are not wasted. I dont think it is really considered gaming the system because its how k00b wants SN to go forward. Everyone seems to be making this a big deal, but l feel its pretty much going to be the same.

And for those that (still) didn't know George Constanza, here the famous quote from Seinfeld series:

I guess it’s a sign of maturity on my part that I know I have nothing to contribute to this debate.

Kinda unrelated but….things got very gamified with MSM and this has pretty much continued to this day. One point is that only rewarding the top 100 leaves a number of low-level stackers excluded from daily rewards and I feel that if we give them a little they will give back more. What behaviours will they exhibit when they only receive CCs instead of sats for their participation? - I suspect they will just give up.

I am interested to see where this all ends up and hoping that territory owners don’t lose out. I getting back in my box now.

I haven’t attached a wallet to the nfl survivor pool account but I have one set up and moved all the sats from SN into that wallet. I am a bit confused as to how our pools will be affected by this but we will see how it goes.

Giving territory founders the ability to pay rent with CCs creates an unfair advantage. They can accumulate CCs strategically, knowing they'll eventually use them to pay rent. For other stackers, the only way to spend CCs is through zapping. I don't understand the benefit of creating a second account other than to manipulate the leaderboard and gain an artificial advantage. It seems to me that the main incentive with CCs is to encourage stackers to zap more frequently in the hopes of earning more daily rewards. It will be interesting to see how the stackers who focus on accumulating CCs respond to this change tomorrow.

Haven't thought about it much but NO!

I want the sats!

If I could sell my cowboy hat I would.

No lar

So troublesome

I already have difficulty maintaining my cowboy streak for this account haha

This is hilarious. Now when the shift is postponed, you get more time to for a strategy how to do it.

I will NOT be attaching a wallet. I want to use CC to pay for my territories.

In fact, I will gladly buy CC with real sats at a 50% discount.

I will use all of my revenue sats to buy discounted CC and pay off my territories for less money.

I might get a few more territories going if this works.

Once everything has been paid for in perpetuity for the full 3 million sats, I will attach a wallet and keep 100% of sats I generate on here and find a way to donate more to rewards.

I'm glad I didn't invest in a territory. I think that it will hurt territory people because we will lose participants.

I understand the reason and this leads to opportunities to grow differently.

I'm reading this and the comments and I'm thinking that this is a mess.

I spent almost a year shitcoining, playing with yield, staking, and other time wasting. I understand the cc but I thought that was long as I can zap and receive I don't have to deal with the cc. I thought the cc was for those who could not self custody.

I