This Chad shows you how rights are protected
Dolores Cahill: Law versus legal: In action: (Part 1):
No questions that cannot be asked & no topics we cannot debate:💞
Next Question: Is there evidence that Law versus legal is playing out before our eyes?
Answer: Evidence from this Man stopped in Australia & his 15 minute interaction, it is informed & insightful...
&
Well worth watching to learn & to observe this exchange & educational: Law versus legal in action:
On one side, says in English:
I am not contracting:
The other side: 🤔
Take note, as you listen... almost every question it is attempting to enter into a contract:
What is your name?
Can I see your 'licence'?
Do you understand?
Stand beside the motorbike, etc:
Ignorance of the Law is no Excuse:
This applies to every Man & Women in this interaction & all interactions:
Operating in the Law makes Life Fair & Straight forward, as all Men & Women are accountable for their Actions & Omissions including what they say & do & all hold liability in Law for their Actions:
All Men & Women are innocent until proven guilty:
Lawful 'Trial by Jury' holds Men & Women accountable & evidence from the interaction can be given
&
can establish Precedence in Law & can 'Nullify' written documents, acts, statutes etc:
If there is no crime in Law, any accusations & detention may be Unlawful:
Note: It is always good to stand back & give time for the Lawful paperwork to be read:
Note: Could he have had originals & copies & given copies only?
Note: He had Lawful paperwork on Ownership, Insurance, Affidavit of his identity, a Man, alive & Notarised.
This is Law versus legal: In action:
In the Hierarchy of Law:
The Law - Act in Honour & Do No Harm & Inalienable Rights is Superior in Law & Higher Up in the Hierarchy of Law:
The Lawful language must be spoken, here English:
Law & Natural Law is Superior than any 'legal' 'fiction', 'corporation' & any agent of a 'corporation' & all written acts, statutes, etc which ONLY apply to the agents, & persons, citizens, corporations & do Not apply to Men & Women, as alive:
If these are 'Agents' of a 'Corporation', it is Unlawful to 'dress up' & imply one role, e.g. in the Law but to be operating in another, e.g legal;
&
If involving a payment of any kind, the Lawful 'Trial by Jury' may ask for evidence of:
- any financial conflict of interest:
- any undisclosed CHARGE on any financial account
- any undisclosed TRUST initiated without consent
- any undisclosed additional payment:
No Man or Woman is above the Law:
Domino Effect: A game changing positive: 💞
The remedy towards 'agents' of 'corporations', e.g. 'Crown' or 'City of London', Londinium, COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA, UNITED KINGDOM, etc is the same world wide: 💞
Precedence in Law: One Precedence example can & does Nullify in Law, using a Lawful 'Trial by Jury':
Some additional questions:
Law: is this a Man operating Lawfully speaking English
versus
legal: is it Crown or a corporation agent using a dead/foreign language, e.g. legalese:
Other options to begin:
You have asked me to stop my travel, I wish to ask you some questions for me to identify who you are & your role here today, as in Law, you must identify who you are first:
For clarification:
I do not consent to any contact here:
I reserve All my Rights Forever:
I do not waive any Rights:
I do not accept ANY assumptions of Law:
I am operating in Law & Natural Law now & I am a Man/Woman & alive now:
I am recording this, in the event it is ever needed as evidence:
What is your Name?
What Jurisdiction are you operating in now?
I am only speaking in English now, what language are you speaking now?
What is your Role here today, now?
Are you operating & employed in Law now?
Can you confirm if you are operating as an agent now? If so, please give details:
Can you produce evidence of who you are?
You consent, to provide evidence of what you say here today, in writing, your employment, the jurisdiction etc: