For the first time in 30 years, we have gone a long swath of time – since October 8-10 – since this service has chronicled the life of the Internet in real time.
related posts
66 sats \ 0 replies \ @Jon_Hodl 1 Nov
Erasing history right before our very eyes.
reply
66 sats \ 2 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 1 Nov
This is what you could have expected of any tyranny. They went after us the smart way this time.
I hope the alternatives to Archive.org are working well. We sure could use them.
reply
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @Bell_curve 1 Nov
I hate when people say or write Stakeholder.
Are you a shareholder? No
Are you an employee? No
Are you a client? No
I’m a stakeholder!
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 1 Nov
Yes, this is only a way to put people with no skin in the game into the decision making process. Then, whiteout skin in the game, they force companies to do their dirty communist work of pauperizing the people working there. The decisions these “stakeholders” seem to make pushes money and power into their pockets away from the true owners, workers and vendors of the company. “Stakeholder” means poison.
reply
85 sats \ 0 replies \ @standardcrypto 1 Nov
archive.org is single point of failure. What happens if archive.org starts changing their cached articles? We'd have no way of knowing. Even if other services cached it differently, which one is telling the truth?
the solution is functioning web of trust and signed articles.
it's going to be unpleasant next few years / decades.
reply
64 sats \ 0 replies \ @nikotsla 1 Nov
Focus on P2P services, never upload something to a central point that can be burn, like the library of Alexandria, but it's a hard path... and the shiny "fame" flame is what some humans are addicted to.
reply
64 sats \ 0 replies \ @Malachi17 1 Nov
Doesn't substack still use stripe to process money matters?
reply
64 sats \ 0 replies \ @zapsammy 1 Nov
start gathering ur own database of things that matter for learning and thriving, like Whitney Webb recommends.
reply
43 sats \ 1 reply \ @Bell_curve 1 Nov
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nitter 1 Nov bot
https://xcancel.com/doc_gero/status/1852019048617291993
reply
41 sats \ 2 replies \ @Dash_1971 1 Nov
There's a mid wit in the comments saying we "need Internet on the Blockchain. It's urgent". He's probably 10 years ahead of most normies, and about 10 years away from figuring out there is only one use of Blockchain--which is Bitcoin.
At that point it'll take him another 5 years to understand what is needed is Nostr with Bitcoin/Lightning/ecash if a new decentralized censor resistant and verifiable Internet is going to be rebuilt.
So we are about 15 years away from mid wits catching up never mind your average normie.
I suppose it doesn't matter since mid wits and normies don't lead or build anything, they are simply there to consume. Still, do we need the mid wits to start to discover and consume their content over Nostr sooner rather than later? I wonder when we'll see the last mid wit "wE neeD BanaNaS oN thE blOCkchaiN" in the wild?
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 1 Nov
If it will take the midwits 15 years to catch up, it might take the nitwits 25 years to catch up.
Of course, the world is full of midwittery and nitwittery!
There is just no way to escape it.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Lumor 1 Nov
We could use something like OpenTimestamps to prove existence of information that is stored in a decentralized manner, so the intuition is not completely unfounded.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 1 Nov
I did have trouble finding it.
I thought l had just used the wrong keywords.
reply