The question you have to ask now is, “Who is playing these language and lawful or legal tricks?”
We already know the WHY of this situation.
We just have to know who is who and in what relationship.

sovereigns have the right to bear arms, not firearms

there is no law/act/statute to register an arm

it's a language trick, like with *human rights*, to change the legal meaning of words

the market is free, color of market is another language trick


https://www.epi.org/publication/the-color-of-law-a-forgotten-history-of-how-our-government-segregated-america/


I suspect that you are saying unregistered firearms that are also stolen or otherwise not the property of the seller are the ones that are dishonored. Is that correct?

I thought that all free markets were considered “black markets” if they sold “unapproved” goods.

Politics_And_Law

Which is your most important human right?

Rothbardian_fanatic

I suspect that you are saying unregistered firearms that are also stolen or otherwise not the property of the seller are the ones that are dishonored. Is that correct?
I thought that all free markets were considered “black markets” if they sold “unapproved” goods.