pull down to refresh

61 sats \ 4 replies \ @Coinsreporter 31 Oct \ on: Tiered Sybil Fee Idea meta
I've a simple solution. We can have one more post type 'Pool' without the Sybil fee with options to declare winners and paying them there.
I don't know if this is technically possible or not.
write
preview
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @grayruby OP 31 Oct
Hmm but you would still want all pool posts to have fees just not the winning post. Maybe there should be a certain amount of non fee zaps each stacker can get a month.
reply
61 sats \ 2 replies \ @Coinsreporter 31 Oct
I'm saying that we have a specific 'Bounty like button' which doesn't have Sybil fee. Apart from that everything should remain as normal. There can be some extra fees applied to create a pool though.
reply
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby OP 31 Oct
Interesting.
reply
40 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 31 Oct
While we create a pool with a Pool post there should be a tab or tabs below the post to zap after the pool concludes and only that should be allowed to zap by tagging the winner of winners.
reply