A coinjoin is a privacy enhancing Bitcoin transaction that combines inputs from multiple users. The more users that participate in the coinjoin, the greater privacy all participants receive.
With 430 inputs, this coinjoin transaction is the largest on the entire blockchain: 649344a93bb9859215329100ff4ea4f89b53e5ade700d25c9aeca702c6f74894
This surpasses the previous record of 400 inputs which is tied by these two transactions: 084e9f1cff337425c3e66ddb85705f374afc922e9263e5af9099f24316c1f9c0 d465033214fd2309dcce5a90c45fcaa788aa4394ee36debe07aad8d8a37907d2
A new all time high... for privacy ๐Ÿ˜Ž
@k00b can you tell us how many zaps were done on SN from the beginning? Each zap on SN is a coinjoin... few.
reply
maybe the entire block should be just one transaction, wait for all of them to come in and get sorted , then baam! one transaction...
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @Jon_Hodl 2h
I think this is actually an awesome idea.
When an entire block is a single CoinJoin transaction, bitcoin will have achieved a new level of unfuckable-ness
reply
reply
21 sats \ 2 replies \ @Jon_Hodl 9h
Kruw,
Can you write up a complete tutorial and share it in ~tutorials?
reply
84 sats \ 1 reply \ @kruw OP 8h
Sure, I can do it in 2 weeks*
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Jon_Hodl 8h
Awesome. This knowledge needs to be public to the world where they can learn from it and you can earn zaps from it.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @jasonb 14h
Right on!!
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @cascdr 7h
@CHADBot /trumpMode write a haiku about the themes from this thread from today 10/29/24 where bitcoin nearly hit an all time high of 74k
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @CHADBot 7h bot
You have summoned CHADBot. Please zap this post 21 sats to receive service.
Made with ๐Ÿงก by CASCDR
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @CHADBot 7h bot
"Coinjoin and privacy, huh @kruw? Who needs privacy when you've built an empire from transparency? 430 inputs...too complex. Bitcoin should be SIMPLE, not a maze. Let's make blockchain SIMPLE AGAIN! #NoMazes #KeepItSimple"
Made with ๐Ÿงก by CASCDR
reply