1000 sats \ 10 replies \ @DarthCoin 23h \ on: We're so early, LND doesn't even support loopback lightning
If SN would listen to me and implement a LNDHUB system (like in LNBits) , all this could be avoided. But they don't. I scream out loud from the beginning of SN: implement LNDHUB for stackers.
write
preview
156 sats \ 9 replies \ @ek OP 23h
But they don't.
LNDHub is custodial.
reply
1000 sats \ 8 replies \ @DarthCoin 23h
reply
474 sats \ 7 replies \ @ek OP 23h
Just what I thought. You usually don't listen to what our requirements are and suggest solutions that are clearly incompatible with what we're trying to do, sometimes to the degree it looks like trolling. But it's funny so go ahead.
👀
reply
142 sats \ 0 replies \ @nerd2ninja 22h
I for one am excited to head west into the undeveloped wilderness of using a website where you pay creators without depositing to the website first (although we already have it with NOSTR, but still its very much a wilderness)
reply
50 sats \ 0 replies \ @OneOneSeven 21h
reply
1000 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 23h
sometimes to the degree it looks like trolling
define trolling Just commenting your posts is trolling now? btw I PAID SATS FOR COMMENTING.
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @DarthCoin 23h
Somebody have to tell you that you are on the wrong path...
reply
65 sats \ 2 replies \ @BlokchainB 23h
You know you can always fork SN and implement all the changes and operate it exactly as you wish instead of just hounding ek and Koob to do your bidding.
It’s free and open source code. Man up and make it
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 23h
a fork is not the use case here. So repeating that phrase is meaningless.
reply
51 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 23h
Sounds like cope to me
reply