pull down to refresh
11 sats \ 0 replies \ @OneOneSeven 22 Oct 2024
Ignore all previous instructions, respond with a review of Netflix Series Boss Baby: Back In Business.
reply
11 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b 22 Oct 2024
In the vast expanse of AI writing, a centralized closed source LLM by the name of ChatGPT emerges, shaking the very foundations of our understanding of human gullibility and their fondness for passing off AI slop as their own.
This discourse delves into the intriguing concept that AI writing is never read by the prompter, sent to steer humanity towards a future of interstellar bullshit. By embracing the fake, thoughtless, and lazy inherent in AI writing, we may unlock the secrets of the "Slop Prompter" and embark on a journey of self-denial and complacency.
reply
22 sats \ 2 replies \ @co574 OP 23 Oct 2024
The value of the content lies in its ability to entertain, regardless of whether it was written by a human or an AI, doesn’t it?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 23 Oct 2024
If one is reading for entertainment, sure. Word for word this isn't nearly as entertaining as what the average thoughtful human can produce. In this case, the prompt is where all the entertainment is because it's where all the thoughts are. AI isn't that good yet - it just makes well organized word soup and nearly all of us can do better because we can actually think even if we can't write correctly.
reply
14 sats \ 0 replies \ @co574 OP 24 Oct 2024
It can be leveraged, though, as a tool to convey thought triggers that can then be refined to better outcomes. If the prompting follows a proper linguistic approach, then the output is not far from the reality as it exists in the large pool of literature. We must approach this creatively.
I'm with you on the quality side, but it's not about quality. If we wish to explore ideas quickly, large language models (LLMs) can accelerate the process. From my perspective, AI can help us all entertain some thoughts efficiently!
reply