pull down to refresh

Why you say no zapping?
Are you inspired by Darth's recent views on zapping?
No, it's just that sometimes I want to post a quick suggestion that literally took me 3 seconds to think of and a minute to post. Sats seem unwarranted. It's just a recommendation.
reply
Hmm, sounds like the labor theory of value...
What do you think @Undisciplined?
Part of the miracle of free markets is that the creator often doesn't understand the true value of their creation.
Solution may be for you to throw the zaps into the pool for everyone.
reply
reply
OK, glad I just swallowed my tea before seeing this. Best comment of the day.
reply
That occurred to me.
reply
43 sats \ 1 reply \ @kepford 21 Oct
I put that poorly. Value is subjective and not objective. Your valuation of your work isn't wrong... its just yours. But it also isn't objective. To me, this is a fundamental thing that for many seems obvious but it seems very deep to me. I think we often get hung up on the true/false of things instead of the data points that make up the macro level of things.
reply
I get it. I never gave it much thought before.
reply
I get your point but it's good info. Sometimes it's not about time, it's about how worthy the information is. Don't we sometimes zap a link with thousands of sats? Posting that link might have taken the op hardly a few seconds.
I just wanna say that zapping Sats is an integral part of SN and suggesting otherwise is gonna harm SN and as such I'm gonna reply Darth on his post. You'll soon see it.
reply
Okay. I was going to say maybe we should have a way to post without the possibility of zapping, but then I thought it through and came to the same conclusion as you.
reply