pull down to refresh

Not specific to this article, but many of the papers draw conclusions like "Bitcoin cannot be a currency, because it is driven by speculation."

I think that misses the point that people are speculating in it as something that will become a prevailing currency. I don't know if the authors are just being very precise with present vs future tenses (I doubt it), or if they are totally missing the point.

it's a stupid lazy criticism

How did Soros make all his money? shorting the british pound

reply

Yeah, I'm sure I'll run into papers that I disagree a lot with. i was pleasantly surprised that the first paper I chose gave a very fair shake to Bitcoin. I didn't know Athey's views on Bitcoin so I didn't really know what to expect.

reply