pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @south_korea_ln OP 16 Oct \ parent \ on: [Daily puzzle] log of a sum and sum of logs science
That's some lucky trial and error.
Bonus question: can one prove this would be the only solution for ?
Haven't worked it out fully, but I think it would go something like this:
Suppose .
Then for any :
We'd only have to check because you asked for natural number solutions, and we know 1,2,3 is the smallest such solution.
reply
Only figured it out for symmetric triplets...
Assume for some and . The sum and product of the triplet are:
- Sum:
- Product:
We set the sum equal to the product:
Assuming , divide both sides by :
This leads to the equation:
Thus, . For to be a natural number, must be a perfect square.
- For
: The triplet is (x - d, x, x + d) = (1, 2, 3).
No other values of yield a perfect square for , because is not a perfect square for .
reply