pull down to refresh

Ok got it. This seems correct. I'll have to figure out why my approach is giving a different result. I likely must have applied it incorrectly. Please don't spend more time on this, I'm assuming the error must be on my side at this point.
You're right, I incorrectly applied Descartes. 1/12 is correct. My bad...
reply
Oh, neat, I didn't know about Descartes' theorem!
So you're calculating
where curvature is (the inverse of the radius).
If I pick , and to calculate
Now we can simply repeat with , and to calculate
So radius or diameter
reply
And I guess a direct formula for circle could be
reply
Yes, exactly.
a fractal generated by starting with a triple of circles, each tangent to the other two, and successively filling in more circles, each tangent to another three.
reply