pull down to refresh

Ok got it. This seems correct. I'll have to figure out why my approach is giving a different result. I likely must have applied it incorrectly. Please don't spend more time on this, I'm assuming the error must be on my side at this point.

You're right, I incorrectly applied Descartes. 1/12 is correct. My bad...

reply

Oh, neat, I didn't know about Descartes' theorem!

So you're calculating

where curvature is (the inverse of the radius).

If I pick , and to calculate

Now we can simply repeat with , and to calculate

So radius or diameter

reply

And I guess a direct formula for circle could be

reply

Yes, exactly.

Related to Apollonian gaskets

a fractal generated by starting with a triple of circles, each tangent to the other two, and successively filling in more circles, each tangent to another three.
reply