Concordance with ownership. Bitcoin si not like others \ stacker news ~bitcoin

Our dear friend @DarthCoin made a post about one of the many stupid things that have been written about Bitcoin, namely that "Bitcoin is like other digital currencies, nothing new." After attacking like a good Maximalist Bitcoiner against this sovereign stupidity and I was enjoying his dissertation, I started to think about something I was reading in the afternoon about mining pools, where there is dominance of a few and curiously one of them is BINANCE, but when I continue reading and searching I find that Mr. CZ Binance is one of the important holders of Bitcoin,

" BitInfoCharts, a website that tracks multimillionaire and millionaire bitcoin wallets, discovered that most of the top 10 wallet addresses are linked to the Binance cryptocurrency exchanges "

Then I am struck by the incongruity between what Binance proposes with its BNB and the sum of other shit coins and projects that they promote and then abandon, leaving those who trust them in a bad light.

So think, if Bitcoin is like other digital currencies, why do the owners of those other digital currencies accumulate so many BITCOIN for themselves?

ISN'T THAT SOMETHING WEIRD?

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 13 Oct 2024

Is because scammers will always scam clueless noobs nocoiners. They always offer them shitcoins in exchange for bitcoin. So they can accimulate more. See what is doing the fiat maxi Saylor: grabbing all btc and give you a loan in fiat!

That's why people should embrace bitcoin maximalism and reject anything else. Many consider me a toxic crazy man but my toxicity have a strong reason: shitcoins are keeping us slowing down towards freedom. Are just another tool to enslave people becaise all of them are directly linked to fiat.