@siggy47 for his take on politics and law. But when he goes beyond that and touches some subtle aspects of consciousness, you may rank him amongst the GOATS.
@Undisciplined for his wise takes on economy but he loves sports (or sports bettings, haha). His reports on SN functioning are the ones among the All Time Posts.
@Coinsreporter is making it more like reporting about India. But his sports pools were the ones you can't miss and definitely can't miss the Olympics Medal ceremony.
@Natalia's guides on The Art of Using Stacker News has to be distributed like a pamphlet to every stacker but she loves a Nomad life and you gonna love her writings if you even have a little bit of Nomad in yourself.
The next is @davidw. Man, you gonna love his writings. They are all worth reading. He's one of those rare breeds in writing who's a MASTER OF ALL AND A JACK OF NONE.
@cryotosensei has got it all what it takes to be a reporter/ writer. He is like give me anything, I'll turn it into gold. His writings stress a lot on parenthood but they are full of truth.
@Public_N_M_E you'd know him for his daily contribution to music and it's right but he's been so from the beginning but he's also a sports lover. His consistency is a big inspiration.
@TomK's regular bytes on economic situation are the ones you can't miss. They are precise and full of truth.
@DesertDave's takes on spiritualism can leave you thinking most of the times but you can't miss his passion for Bitcoin mining.
hey thanks for the shout out!! because of all these other guys, I'm excited to come here everyday and it's been really fun to share some of my stuff too
There are many other good teachers here, better than me. Only that are not so active on SN like me. For example: Murch, Justin (Shocknet), Kevin (LL), Aljaz, Supertestnet and many more. I wish they were more active on SN, but is true, usually they do not engage in meaningless discussions with shitcoiners.
I love compiling data, but you have to be very careful when drawing conclusions. Data should be read with caution because sometimes at first glance the data is not what it seems. I've noticed that some stackers don't read the methodology and then draw the wrong conclusions.
I mostly like the reports by people reporting on their field of expertise. The occasional but extremely valuable input from a core developer, an AMA by the CEO from a certain company, boots-in-the-field reports by people benefiting from freedom tech such as Bitcoin or NOSTR, a personal but insightful comment based on your own experience raising a kid, a detailed guide on how you've set up you are managing Lightning liquidity, etc...
Overall, I prefer positive stackers too. A little bit of doomsday reporting is healthy and interesting, but I prefer to believe our future is bright.
My advice would always be to favor quality over quantity. Report on what you know a lot about. If you don't have such knowledge (yet), report on interesting external content, but provide context whenever possible. Links without any quoted text rarely grasp my attention when no context is provided. That's why when I visit Hackernews (less and less, thanks to SN), I often read the first few comments first to know if the article is worth my read. SN provides the additional advantage that you can provide context directly under your linked article as OP.