pull down to refresh

Now The New Yorker is weighing in. I knew the article would be long and biased. I never trusted the whole "there's no such thing as bad publicity" thing, but in the end it's all just noise.
It’s all noise . We are all Satoshi
reply
Yes? You called? 😁
reply
How are you
reply
Just swell. And you?
reply
Fantastic. Pouring rain 🌧️ here currently
reply
Finally somthing with the substance!
I think if we keep on posting for Satoshi's identity article in such a large number, he'll be compelled to show up here on SN.
reply
New Yorker runs out of ideas so they must "improvise". Tomorrow they will discover who killed Kennedy... Low rating is a b.i.a.t.c.h...lol
reply
But but but... Now it's on HBO!?
I'm gonna go balance my channels.
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @krawall 9 Oct
good one! I don't believe in balancing though, it's just not worth it.
reply
In the brief time I've run my little node. I have to agree with you.
But I couldn't resist.
reply
Everything coming from the Establishment is nothing but dross. I don’t think we will ever know for sure who the inventor was. Perhaps the inventor was a whole large crew of people working on a secret Manhattan like project which will not be de-classified for the next 75 years (you know, just like Pfizer and the jab).
reply
Every time this happens, its just noise. Because the person is so wealthy and a mystery. I feel like every year they come up with someone new.
reply
43 sats \ 0 replies \ @Taft 9 Oct
Even if this is true, no one will believe it.
reply
Never, he will.
reply
Claims will always arise, but Satoshi will always remain unknown.
reply