pull down to refresh
1 sat \ 15 replies \ @DarthCoin 9 Oct \ parent \ on: Darthcoin might be an OG Stacker, but I dont trust. I read FAQ. Is Darth WRONG?! meta
Again you are misleading in answers.
Just few weeks ago I asked you about how is influencing if I zap 100 sats and then came back and zap again 100 sats the same post.
You said, that it doesn't matter. It matters only the first zap.
I just made a test with your comment, zapping twice 1 sats. It says "from 0 stackers / 2 from me".
So where are the "voters" separately ?
Here's the comment: #683684
You asked:
Not related to this debate, but came to my mind something and wanted to ask you about. If I zap a post, let's say I am the 1st one, with 100 sats. I also comment first. Then after a while, after I wait until more are coming to comment and zap, I zap again same post let's say 1000 sats. Then after a while again 2000 sats. Is this affecting the algo for the OP and for me ? I am just curious how this plays out. You know I am not interested in gainz...
I said:
For the OP, it's the same either way. For you, the late zaps are less eligible for rewards than your earlier ones.
You asked about zap timing, not sats, in a thread discussing rewards, not ranking. My answer to your question in that thread addresses the effect of zap timing on the reward "algo."
I might've misunderstood your question. You might've misunderstood my answer.
reply
I might've misunderstood your question. You might've misunderstood my answer.
maybe
reply
60% of the time using qualifiers like maybe makes you right 100% if the time! đŻđŻ
reply
Is this the algo? (from github)
SELECT id, row_number() OVER (ORDER BY ((GREATEST("weightedVotes", POWER("weightedVotes", 1.2)) + "weightedComments"/2) / POWER(GREATEST(3, EXTRACT(EPOCH FROM (now_utc() - created_at))/3600), 1.3) + (boost/5000::float) / POWER(EXTRACT(EPOCH FROM (now_utc() - created_at))/3600+2, 2.6)) DESC NULLS LAST, id DESC) as rank FROM "Item" WHERE "parentId" IS NULL AND NOT bio AND "pinId" IS NULL AND "deletedAt" IS NULL AND "weightedVotes" > 0 ORDER BY ((GREATEST("weightedVotes", POWER("weightedVotes", 1.2)) + "weightedComments"/2) / POWER(GREATEST(3, EXTRACT(EPOCH FROM (now_utc() - created_at))/3600), 1.3) + (boost/5000::float) / POWER(EXTRACT(EPOCH FROM (now_utc() - created_at))/3600+2, 2.6)) DESC NULLS LAST, id DESC LIMIT 2100;
reply
Thank you for sharing the actual code. This is the promise of FOSS SN. We donât need to trust @k00b or risk misunderstanding an explanation from the FAQ. We can verify for ourselves! Which file had this snippet?
reply
Maybe it was this one?
stacker.news/prisma/migrations/20240228011144_user_values_view
/migration.sql
I can't remember what I searched on right now. If you search for "weightedvotes" you get lots of results.
Honestly, this gives a clue to what might be going on, but to really say positively I'm not sure this is good enough.
reply
Hey âweightedvotesâ is already a clue! I appreciate ya, cowboy! đ¤
reply
reply
Am I wrong? No, itâs the SN algo thatâs wrong!đ
reply
reply
That screenshot is to remind everybody with who they are talking: a gov scum.
reply
reply
hey statist, pay your fucking taxes and STFU
https://m.primal.net/LRHz.mp4
reply
He doesnât hold grudges, does he??
reply