pull down to refresh
67 sats \ 6 replies \ @grayruby 8 Oct \ parent \ on: Who's Satoshi Nakamoto according to you? oracle
I don't think it is low. It is probably high compared to a lot of stackers but maybe not as high as some of the other regulars in the top 10.
The trust score mechanism at SN is fantastic for at least we are talking about. Can you say the same for any other platform?
I personally don't have any objections to how it works except for my "Daily Zap'" post always remains way down under, sometimes even lower to a few posts whi have been zapped only 10 Sats.
reply
That's sorting on "top", not "hot"?
reply
Yes. It's after sorting by top.
reply
I just checked that out. It is surprising. Maybe my trust score isn't as high as k00b led me to believe.
reply
If you check out for the previous days, you'd be surprised even more. Somebody's 10 Sat zap is more valuable than a lot of other stackers' so many zaps in hundreds.
That made me believe one more thing that any game like MM or FFF on SN can be easily manipulated by top ranks. It'd just require someone's 10 sat zap to get the top rank.
I tried ~music pool with another formula but that went like I won my own pool.
At last, I just wanna say, we can keep speculating for SN algo in the same way as we do for who Satoshi is.
reply
Yeah, there's a lot of inertia in the trust scores.
reply