The European Union's recent decision to impose hefty tariffs of 45% on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs) has exposed a glaring contradiction in its climate policy. While claiming to champion CO2 reduction in transportation, the EU's protectionist measures effectively limit access to affordable green alternatives.
This move raises questions about the sincerity of Europe's commitment to combating climate change. If reducing emissions were truly the priority, wouldn't the logical step be to open markets wider, enabling more consumers to purchase cost-effective, eco-friendly vehicles?
Instead, the EU has opted to shield its automotive industry from competition, potentially slowing the transition to cleaner transportation. This decision reveals that economic protectionism may be trumping environmental concerns in Brussels.
The irony is palpable: in the name of climate protection, Europe is making it harder for its citizens to adopt cleaner technologies. This policy not only contradicts stated climate goals but also risks delaying the widespread adoption of EVs across the continent.
The correct policy would be to dismantle the bureaucratic apparatus and also leave the automotive industry to free competition. Let companies and consumers decide on the best allocation of resources in the economy, not ideology-soaked officials far away in Brussels.
Its not a smart thing to base your core policies on a literal scam and all the collective hallucinations derived from that!
reply
No, they actually have realised that their propoganda can't go on forever. The world has realised that pollution by the waste material of batteries would be more harmful.
reply

EU official target for climate

In 2023, the EU adopted a set of Commission proposals to make the EU's climate, energy, transport and taxation policies fit for reducing net greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% by 2030, compared to 1990 levels. **This will enable the EU to become the first climate-neutral continent. https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/climate-strategies-targets/2030-climate-targets.
And if they don't do it, we all will die. What a bullshit! I don't see this propaganda running till 2030.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @q 5h
We can first of all declare that tariffs in the long run are bad for domestic innovation because the real competition is played out and there is no incentives to improve anymore.
Regarding the situation with China, actions must be taken because Chinese producers receive government subsidies, making it impossible to compete fairly. The challenge is to balance maintaining domestic innovation with reducing CO2 emissions, without ignoring the impact of external market forces.
I don't now how valid this data is might suspect that China needs to make some actions: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/co-emissions-per-capita?tab=chart&country=CHN~European+Union+%2828%29
reply
It's almost like the green energy policies are just there to enrich a special interest lobby.
reply
Interesting way of seeing things. How clean is that tech though?
reply