pull down to refresh

136 sats \ 5 replies \ @k00b OP 5 Oct \ parent \ on: SN Saturday Newsletter 10/5/24 meta
It wouldn't be fair though. We have extra incentives.
write
preview
184 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined 5 Oct
If you believe that your rewards system incentivizes positive contributions, wouldn't those extra incentives still manifest in beneficial behavior.
I'm pretty sure that some of us will still regularly beat @ek.
@siggy47 (presumably) and I are the only ones who will really be negatively impacted by you going full force. Give us a challenge and give yourselves stronger incentives to contribute.
reply
29 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b OP 5 Oct
Hmmm I should at least un-nerf @ek. I did start earning revenue for my territories recently and that's pretty nice (although I never "paid" for them either).
Before we nerfed kr and I, we'd always be at the top.
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 5 Oct
It doesn't make a ton of sense for you to pay for them, since that just goes right back to you.
reply
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @realBitcoinDog 5 Oct
But do you? It’s FOSS. Do you take a salary from the fees? Who is hosting the servers SN runs on?
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 5 Oct
We have VC funding so we pay ourselves with that. We have a bit of revenue from territories but we are super duper far from being profitable.
reply