Why I Use Disappearing Messagesodysee.com/@NaomiBrockwell:4/disappearing-messages:5?r=8T2xqWjtafHWYGxQBSsrbw1wQPm7sWRq
727 sats \ 16 comments \ @Undisciplined 15h security
From Naomi Brockwell
Video Description
In today’s digital world, nothing is truly secure. Imagine waking up to find that a hacker had posted every conversation you’ve ever had online. We don't need to keep a permanent trail of all of our digital conversations, that could be hacked at any time, and there are deep psychological effects when we do so.
In this video, I make a case for using disappearing messages.
Whether we’re safeguarding sensitive information, limiting our exposure, or simply reducing the clutter of our digital lives, turning on disappearing messages is a small change with significant impact. Disappearing messages are a great tool in your privacy toolbox for this increasingly permanent digital age.
write
preview
related posts
61 sats \ 4 replies \ @k00b 15h
re: detecting AI my aidar went off reading the video description.
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 15h
Maybe so. It's taken straight from the video, but for all I know she uses AI to write her scripts.
reply
34 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b 15h
The most common "honest" use of AI writing I've seen so far is for summarization so it tracks.
It's a self-defeating use though - summaries are the main thing people read so it's the last place a content maker should get lazy.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 14h
Good point. I hadn't thought about that.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 13h
Yep. I agree.
reply
88 sats \ 1 reply \ @wingalt 12h
Are deleted messages also disappear from the hosting servers? I see very well big tech keeping a record of everything
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 12h
I have no confidence that these things are actually deleted, but deleting may still make it marginally more difficult for someone to recover your messages.
She mentioned Telegram being worse than signal for deleting messages, but I've already forgotten the details of that.
reply
36 sats \ 8 replies \ @Satosora 15h
I was thinking about something earlier. If you nade your messages on sn disappear...would you remain relevent?
reply
20 sats \ 7 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 15h
As long as you keep interacting with people and leave your stuff up long enough, I imagine you would.
We've had some fairly prominent folks who delete a lot of their content.
reply
40 sats \ 6 replies \ @Satosora 15h
A one year deletion cycle? It defeats the purpose of stacker news though.....
reply
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined OP 15h
I don't personally like deleting content, but stacker news' purpose is to be a valued place for stackers to share information. If ephemeral posts and comments are what some stackers value, then it's good that SN makes it possible.
reply
23 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 15h
Me either. But l have thought about it, and l have seen it done before. That fandago guy does it often.
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Satosora 15h
@k00b what are your thoughts on deleting and SN? Are we being overprotective of our useless thoughts and opinions? Lol
reply
20 sats \ 2 replies \ @nym 12h
I don’t mind it. I know HN limits what you can delete to preserve conversation threads, unless you email them with a request for deletion.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Satosora 11h
Can that happen here? If you delete the post, will all the comments disappear?
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 2h
I don’t think so. Deleted items are overwritten with “deleted by author” to preserve the item in the item tree (parent child, reply to, etc) but the content itself is gone
reply