pull down to refresh

I mostly go on feel. It usually has an intense averageness not just in writing quality but in perspective and even when the perspective is prompted to have bias. It has an unusual breadth when most good writing tends to be focused and deep with selective breadth. It tends to have an abundance of facts - names, dates, times - with an irrelevant, inhuman exactness. The word count and effort also are out of place for the context.
Yeah, great points.
I updated my course AI policy to say that I'll take away points if you write like AI, even if you didn't actually use AI. I think this is defensible because in this day and age, writing too much like AI is in itself a weakness.
I do mention that it's highly unlikely that anyone naturally writes like AI, and almost always when someone runs a text through an AI detection tool and it comes out positive, it's usually AI.
The policy is really so that I don't need to spend any time trying to prove whether or not someone actually used AI.
reply
As soon as we read, it kinda smells artificial. No errors, accurate punctuation, syntax is above par and so on.
reply
Exactly. The total lack of errors is also a giveaway
reply