it is but nevertheless it adds value because without being able to prompt the LLM properly, value couldn’t have surfaced.
in the beginning I though text generated by LLMs is a bad thing, too.
but after a year and a half, i have to tell you that if you are skilled enough to prompt the models right, value can be unlocked.
what’s the point of writing up smth instead of putting together smth faster and then review it so it becomes better?
all of those who believe that LLM generated content is bad are missing the point!
reply
Of course it is. 100%.
reply
i was about to zap it... i still suck at quickly recognizing low effort.
reply
putting together the right prompts towards a quality outcome is not low effort. looking forward all content will be AI generated. the point is to be able to formulate the text in a way that it’s valid, true, unbiased and readable.
i don’t buy the “low effort” claim.
it took me a lot to craft it like this. almost 20 prompts.
and also, it involves a lot of linguistics. guiding the model to produce smth does take effort.
and an top of all, there is the review side where you make the outcome of the model “yours”.
we need to unlearn. we have already shifted….
reply
thank thou for redirecting my thoughts, i can follow thy argument.
nevertheless, the statement "i think therefore i am" needs to be looked at more closely in the era of AI.
reply
LLMs can unlock value ONLY if you know how to guide them!
if you miss this, you miss the whole concept!
for instance, all of those books and their authors didn’t appear there out of nowhere!
people are missing the essence.
LLMs Are a TOOL
you need to know how to use them!
reply
i can see how it's a pretty good search and organize engine. we must be cautious, of course.
reply
There are many AI detectors on the web.
reply
thank you, i will use the AI detectors to train my internal bullshit detector
reply
This is a good one: https://www.zerogpt.com/
reply