Why is the recognition of BRICS growing in importance today?

The primary factor responsible for this shift in global perception is the rapid transfer of the economic centre of gravity from the “West” to Asia, with India and China playing leading roles, and whose significance is actually understated by standard official data.
India is the fifth largest economy in current dollar terms, but by other metrics it is much larger. Benchmarking the total economic output of countries in dollars has a long tradition. There are alternate measures for the overall value generated by an economy (GDP) such as purchasing power parity (PPP ), which take into account that some goods and services cost much less in India and other developing countries than in western countries, and their contribution to GDP can be underestimated if measured at current exchange rates.

BRICS GDP in PPP

As of 2018, the BRICS formation, as a whole, has overtaken the G7 (see figure) in economic output. A lesser known story is the huge increase in intra-global south/intra-BRICS trade and economic activity – i.e. trade and economic interdependence among themselves, vis-a-vis the western partners – with even greater potential for growth.
I'm primarily expecting BRICS to play the role of foil to dollar hegemony. Long-term, I don't have any expectation of these countries forming a cohesive or functional union.
reply
Agreed. I see Russia, China and India as enough disruption to the old world. China and India alone that like 35% of the world population. The question is why BRICS wouldn't be a disruption, they certainly are and will change the world as we know it.
reply
I agree. I could imagine them functioning for long term if only China wasn't there.
reply
That's a long-term vs short-term tradeoff. With China, the short-term viability is much greater.
reply
No matter how the world views this group, it's the power shift that's happening right now. If all goes well between China and India, nothing can stop this group dominate geopolitics within a decade.
reply