pull down to refresh
Only mining for electricity is considered.
It's mining for the production of electricity producing equipment, right? Otherwise, it makes no sense whatsoever. I mean, obviously coal comes from mines and wind doesn't.
My point is that concrete is a major component of producing wind turbines and nuclear plants, but it's not produced by mining. However, quarrying for the materials that produce concrete is not exactly a low impact practice.
It's mining for the production of electricity producing equipment, right?
right!
concrete is a major component of producing wind turbines and ...
I see your point. wind turbines?
Sorry, "windmills"
lol! Even nuclear power plants consumed a tiny fraction of the total cement.
Yeah, and I have no idea what the relative environmental impact is of concrete production vs mining for metals or coal. I just always have my antennae up for misleading representations of data, especially in highly politicized subjects.
Is cement considered as coming from a mine? If not, it would be a little misleading to draw a line between quarrying and mining to make an environmental impact statement.