pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @moneroshill 14 Sep 2022 \ parent \ on: Lightning network centralization metrics bitcoin
It will take decades to open billions of lightning channels. Those toddlers will be young adults by the time that they are all able to open a lightning channel.
Oh, so basically like the existing financial system? This is obviously not what satoshi would have intended, you greedy fucking goober.
It will take decades to open billions of lightning channels
How can one person be wrong this much?
Oh, so basically like the existing financial system? This is obviously not what satoshi would have intended,
No, basically like people are free to choose. Some prefer self custody, some are scared to be responsible.
you greedy fucking goober.
Ad hominem. It really shows your IQ 😂
reply
They are not free to choose if it is infeasable to use bitcoin non-custodially.
You ARE too greedy. You are arguing against the original purpose of bitcoin to prop up your bags.
reply
They are not free to choose if it is infeasable to use bitcoin non-custodially.
Yet, pointed above that self custody on LN currently cost $0.03. Pay attention, please.
You ARE too greedy. You are arguing against the original purpose of bitcoin to prop up your bags.
How are my bags going up or down related to the size of a block???
Are you OK?
reply
Yet, pointed above that self custody on LN currently cost $0.03. Pay attention, please.
currently
How are my bags going up or down related to the size of a block???
Because bitcoiners like you will defend bitcoin's obvious weaknesses (block size) instead of improving them. Today's bitcoiners are obsessed with increasing the price of their bags to the detriment of bitcoin itself.
It was not always like this. You see this in the way that the discussion around bitcoin has completely changed:
reply
Yet, pointed above that self custody on LN currently cost $0.03. Pay attention, please.
currently
So again. You're predicting the future, while ignoring the past. Like a troll.
How are my bags going up or down related to the size of a block???
Because bitcoiners like you will defend bitcoin's obvious weaknesses (block size) instead of improving them. Today's bitcoiners are obsessed with increasing the price of their bags to the detriment of bitcoin itself.
HOW?? Can you factually answer the question, please. It looks like you can't, because it's just another thing you've made up.
It was not always like this. You see this in the way that the discussion around bitcoin has completely changed:
More generalisation, more made up fiction. Bitcoin is and always was a peer to peer electronic cash system. Your attacks to market your dying shitcoin isn't going to work, troll.
reply