This is how I feel too.

I don't exactly understand OP's issue.  If people want to open channels to me, fine.  I don't mind having that channel unbalanced.

It's fine to have more inbound liquidity than outbound. That means other people have deployed their capital inefficiently. Their problem, not yours.

topsecret

The balance is the key. That fact that you already have 1BTC liquidity, is quite big.
For a routing node the important key is to offer same liquidity in both sides, incoming and outgoing. Is not necessary to be on each channel, but in total.

With a larger routing node I would look more into bridging the gaps to routes that are less covered. That is your "income".
For example:

bitcoin

Need 'medium' LN node operators opinion

bartoli

The balance is the key. That fact that you already have 1BTC liquidity, is quite big.
For a routing node the important key is to offer same liquidity in both sides, incoming and outgoing. Is not necessary to be on each channel, but in total.

With a larger routing node I would look more into bridging the gaps to routes that are less covered. That is your "income".
For example:
- you can became a LSP for private node operators
- you can became a swap provider