The real purpose of Bitcoin was not to create a new form of currency, but to create a challenge, a test, a puzzle that would push the boundaries of cryptography and computer science. And the prize?
The first to crack the code, to break the encryption, would gain control over the entire global financial system.
It's all about quantum computing.
The ones who manage to secure quantum computing first will be the ones who can break the code, who can crack the encryption that secures Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. And once they do, they'll have the power to manipulate the global economy, to control the flow of money, and to shape the world to their advantage.
But who are these powerful individuals or organizations?
Are they governments, corporations, or shadowy groups?
We may never know, but one thing is certain: they're working tirelessly to develop quantum computing, to break the code, and to gain control over the world's finances.
And what about the so-called "miners" who are working to secure the Bitcoin network?
Are they just pawns in a much larger game, unwittingly contributing to the development of quantum computing and the eventual downfall of the system they're trying to protect?
The truth is out there, but it's hidden in plain sight. Wake up, sheeple, and see the world for what it truly is: a complex web of deceit and manipulation, with Bitcoin at its center.
Look at the evidence:
• The mysterious disappearance of Satoshi Nakamoto with his large stake
• The rapid development of quantum computing in recent years
• The increasing interest in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies from governments and corporations
• The eerie silence from the powers that be about the true nature of Bitcoin and its connection to quantum computing
It's all too convenient, too suspicious.
The truth is, Bitcoin may not be what it seems.
A Trojan horse, a wolf in sheep's clothing, a cleverly designed trap to lure us into a world of financial slavery?
30 sats \ 0 replies \ @btcs 22 Sep
Bitcoin is a decentralized monetary network with hard peer-to-peer money. Throughout history, money has taken many forms from glass beads, shells, copper, coins made of lead, aluminum, copper, silver, and gold,but money consistently performs only three functions: a store of value, a unit of account, and a medium of exchange. As for quantum computing, it does not pose a threat to Bitcoin because by the time quantum computing becomes available, Bitcoin software will be updated accordingly. So, this narrative is just FUD spread by people who don’t understand how Bitcoin works.
reply
52 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 22 Sep
The first to crack the code, to break the encryption, would gain control over the entire global financial system.
The entire global financial system is already fragile when it comes to quantum computing. You don't need to invent bitcoin and hope and wait for mass adoption to cripple it with hypothetical quantum computers.
I therefore stopped reading after that.
reply
Its not that bad actually, as even with a quantum computer you will have to "break" each address separately (within 10 minutes blocktime).. Thats why the big stash of satoshi nakamotos btc will naturally be the first target... Because there is so much money and these adresses are not hashed, making it easier to crack.. And they are spread across thousands of wallets.. As if he knew that one day maybe we need this "low hanging fruit"...this will give us extra time to migrate to new adress format..
reply
11 sats \ 0 replies \ @zarko 23 Sep
The truth is, Bitcoin may not be what it seems.
Like most things nowadays
reply
It’s a race but who will win?
reply
thanks to Bitcoin, once someone wins everyone will know!
reply
reply
"The real purpose of Bitcoin was not to create a new form of currency, but to create a challenge, a test, a puzzle that would push the boundaries of cryptography and computer science."
Sounds like you didn't read the whitepaper.
reply
hhhmm...a trojan horse? More like a gateway to freedom. Have you read the whitepaper? There was a modern version of it floating around somewhere.
reply