pull down to refresh

The cries for help from German industry can no longer be ignored. The green destruction agenda is now hitting the heart of the German economy and, in addition to the construction industry, is now primarily affecting the chemical industry and the automotive industry, above all VW, which is threatening to close plants and has withdrawn its employment guarantee.
The immense relative increase in the price of German energy, the core piece of the de-growth fatalists, is damaging the energy-intensive sectors that generate our economic value, on which everything is built, on which we as a social society place great value, health care, social services, the pension system or other state-run ponzi schemes that won't be operable for a long time without a strong economy.
Only a free capital market will help us to bury the green-socialist agenda of destruction. It would guarantee a sufficiently high level of real interest rates to flush all the bad investments out of the market.
Our motto: r = 6%!
The supranationally anchored incentive structure, which is safeguarded by the system-friendly media, has created a growing protective wall of subsidy entrepreneurs, which we can only penetrate with difficulty using arguments.
And to all the climate apocalyptics who sectarianly follow this agenda, let me reiterate that only the free market can produce more ecologically sophisticated innovations and resource efficiency.
The efficient combination of scarce resources is in the interests of private companies that are in competition. Only in this way could the free market economy achieve the technological, social and ecological progress that we enjoy today.
If this does not apply, we will end up back in the pestilence of Bitterfeld!
The ecological disasters of socialist economic regimes speak volumes, and should be understood even by the subsidy-corrupted.
The established green subsidy machine is unethical because it damages the middle class and robs poorer members of the population of their opportunities for advancement, not to mention the fact that the gigantic mountains of debt created for this artificial GDP growth will be written into the balance sheet of future generations. This idea naturally also applies to international economic relations.
And once again: an entrepreneur who accepts a subsidy is a welfare recipient!
Isn’t coal becoming a bigger part of Germany’s energy mix than any time in recent memory? Think I read that somewhere. So ironic and counter productive. I might even be willing to find some common ground with the greens if they were more sensible
reply
Yep. They need it as back-up energy and they activated apacities. It's really that stupid
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @draoi 21 Sep
52% of Germany's electricity comes from renewables.
reply
Now do primary energy usage. It's way below 15%
reply
as long as it has its printer, nothing will change , nowhere in Europe.
they will just increase the fiat printer to feed more subsidies, increase taxes, and then import a ton of immigrants that can prop up the pension ponzi
and keep grinding down the middle class until nothing but dust is left
reply
32 sats \ 1 reply \ @TomK OP 21 Sep
I'm fighting the profeteers of this robbing scheme for years. It's a Sisiphos work...
reply
best thing we can all do is stack the shit out of bitcoin and not let the eu get a fucking penny of it, not in taxes, not in anything
reply
Nice piece. I agree, only a free market can help us defeat the socialists agenda. And, unfortunately, most entrepreneurs are welfare recipients.
reply
Thanks. I coined this term some years ago in a symposium in Germany and realized that more than a third of the audience were part of the scheme. That was real fun....
reply
Woww! It's just the way the system is, dishing out subsidies. If that's just Germany, think of the rest of the world, how many entrepreneurs get to depend majorly on the revenue generated from their businesses? Scarcely. Indeed, you nailed it, we have "welfare recipients."
reply
Ultimately, renewable energy is just way more profitable than fossil fuels.
reply