The Risks of Sat per Share Investingfountain.fm/clip/gatRL9w7hvkUOtHDAqFf
162 sats \ 4 comments \ @BlokchainB 21 Sep Stacker_Stocks
The onramp guys do a good job explaining the risks of this paradigm of Sats per share investing.
Points:
  1. Microstrategy is a one of one
  2. Businesses are risky
  3. Custody issues. If the bitcoin is lost your sat per share is zero!
Plus never sell bitcoin to buy stocks unless the opportunity can beat Bitcoin’s number go up technology especially if you are young. Odds are most businesses will fail.
write
preview
related posts
56 sats \ 2 replies \ @Satosora 21 Sep
Isnt the microstrategy split into two companies? One with the btc and the one with the computer software?
reply
49 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 21 Sep
Macrostrategy is a subsidiary of Microstrategy. So technically it is incorporated as a separate company but it operates under microstrategy. Maybe they spin it out at some point and take it public.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB OP 21 Sep
I don’t think so. If it is must be via internal management. They only have one stock ticker
reply
52 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 21 Sep
Beating Bitcoin’s annual returns is a high bar. Generally agree with this maybe a few exceptions. I would happily partake in a community investment in SN.
reply