pull down to refresh

We are living in a world of disinformation and misinformation; Technology and Science are not neutral too. Phenomenons like war and crisis are the best examples of manipulating truth. Mass Media acts as a powerful equipment to distort cognition of citizens all around the world. Some theorists believe this kind of manipulation of truth could be an effective warfare.
During 2 decades of current century climate change was one of the main problematics. There are many official narratives about it, from carbon dioxide doze in atmosphere to meat industry. Also there are some narratives despite the official ones. Here are some examples:
  • Solar Cycles
  • Milankovitch Cycles
  • “Conspiracies”: HARP, Chemtrails, Atomic Experiments & etc
  • Methane Craters
All the narratives accept climate change as a matter of fact but the difference between them is about climate emergency. There is another narrative that deny climate change and believes it’s a scam, but there are many symptoms to prove something happens:
  • Biodiversity Collapse
  • Vast Droughts
  • Wildfires
  • Soil Erosion
  • Hurricanes
  • Thawing Permafrost
As a person who tries to find a narrative closer to the truth, I should confess it’s really confusing. International institutions find a new opportunity to build a new order and governments take advantage of this discourse to spread the domain of surveillance.
I wrote these lines here in order to start a discussion and share my confusion. I’ll be glad to see your awakening comments.
Best website to understand is NASA data. Many of “speculators” ideas are debunked with facts.
For me it’s not anymore about if its real or who did it (this was 1960 mentality, not 2024) but more about how can we implement solutions without main/average people going crazy because they can’t produce CO2 or methane like they are used to. We live in a limited earth with limited ressources but we have the room for unlimited useful and fun solutions.
reply
Cow farts.
reply
Climate change fanatics like to equate pollution which can be resolved at the local level (because who is against clean water and clean air?) and climate change which they claim need a global solution and control of everybody's life, make sure you can tell the difference
reply
I have always thought that climate change is still our responsibility as human beings. Factors such as carbon dioxide, lack of awareness towards our biodiversity, towards nature, we have always polluted, damaged green areas, the habitat of animals (their hunting, trade) and all that contributes to the same destruction of the environment. Climate change is something that mainly affects everyone in general, from animals to us as human beings. We have always lacked environmental awareness (and we still lack it), the power to plant a tree, to teach our children about how if we do not take care of the planet, existence will be difficult.
reply
Pollution is different from climate change @wingalt
reply