pull down to refresh

Reference post: #686209
Short background info: Over at the above post, I had mentioned Mr. Beast came with some unsavory kinds of behavior that went along with his advice. I got some snarky kinds of replies from the OP about how I was presenting myself like I "knew better". Well, I generally don't do the "I told you so" but in this instance there is a bigger message going on than the interaction with the post between us:
The above article makes it clear that Mr. Beast and "Beast Games" were using the above film guidelines to create a kind of human "slavery" for contestants so that they were deemed "Volunteers" with the immediate benefit being some manner of tax break. The suit extends to Amazon, which, as you might recall, denies that I exist as an author. The picture is beginning to become clearer to me as to why they might do that.
OP in the other thread said Mr. Beast was operating at the top of the game, and I mentioned that that isn't necessarily a good trait to have. If the claims in this article are true and the people were just a means for Mr. Beast to climb a ladder, then I'd say his guidelines are worthless since what might have been being rewarded was his antipathy toward human life and its requirements. (A humiliation ritual videoed for everyone else to watch) This would make Mr. Beast just one big, sick game, and the viewers willing participants.
I mean the first clue is his name Mr. Beast, it could be anything. Secondly people are becoming overly focused on doing stupid things for money. Literally people sell their souls for it..hence beast.
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 19 Sep
I never said you "knew better." I said you were putting thoughts in my head which might matter to you ... which frankly makes me think twice about replying, because it's possible you'll know that I'm thinking something different than what I'm saying again.
reply
Well, what you were saying it seemed to me was that he was a good example of being successful whereas what I was thinking was that it was possible that his apparent success had nothing to do with technique. The technique is just the "gloss" which, ironically, is being used in a legal suit against him now.
reply
I also covered this in "The Daily Zap" sports story today. #691206
I used to like him but after last year when he manipulated the whole world to follow him and make him the largest channel on YouTube, I stopped watching him.
reply
Isn't this guy's inner circle a bunch of groomers or something?
reply
I've heard stuff like that in passing, but I don't have a source. The buzz around him seems generally bad.
reply