also remember how you see immediately if a twitter post is a bot generation, how AI writing is immediately visible for its formulaic phrasing and often empty running around the pot without ever shitting, its compulsive ass-covering and "yes-but"ism, and I think this danger is quite far fetched.
also remember how you see immediately if a twitter post is a bot generation, how AI writing is immediately visible for its formulaic phrasing and often empty running around the pot without ever shitting, its compulsive ass-covering and "yes-but"ism, and I think this danger is quite far fetched.
I get where you're coming from, and you're right that AI writing can often be recognizable. However, as AI tools continue to advance, they’re becoming better at mimicking natural language and nuances. It's worth noting that while some posts or texts may still come off as formulaic, others are increasingly harder to distinguish. This evolution in AI's capabilities could make the concerns more relevant over time, so staying aware and critical is definitely important.
... is what ChatGPT suggests to write to counter your point where I specifically asked to obfuscate it was written by an LLM...
Yeah, it's still far from satisfying that prompt~~
reply
it still does all the things I mentioned though. :D
reply
Indeed. It can't pretend not to be itself ;)
reply