In that clip, he didn’t say anything about keeping women out of Bitcoin.
He suggested that universal suffrage and women being in leadership positions is bad for society.
I’ve been wondering lately whether there’s any correlation between the rising authoritarianism and socialism in the liberal West and there being more women in leadership positions, or is it just a coincidence.
Remarkable coincidence. Or not.
reply
oh. yeah. that definitely makes sense. women gaining such freedom happened in, what, the last 70 years or so? There was definitely never any authoritarianism or tyranny anywhere in the world any time in history before that, so we definitely can't blame men. I'm glad you're so smart.
reply
Maybe women as leaders generally value things like communal values and keeping everyone “safe” more than their male counterparts.
This might come at the cost for personal freedoms, self-sovereignty and free markets.
The pandemic was a small case study with the lockdowns and vaccine passes in order to protect and to create “safe spaces”.
reply
More likely, men are like "We're protectors, we'd better make things overly safe" and then the women, who according to svetski really like chaos, come along and say "this is bullshit, your safety came at the cost of my personal freedom and self-sovereignty... I think I shall create feminism to take back my freedom and sovereignty."
Or maybe, saying "it's because of women or men" the way bitcoiners overly do, is very stupid and can be twisted ANY which way one pleases, as it benefits oneself.
reply
Gaining freedom is different from voting or holding positions of leadership or authority
reply
It is not.
reply