pull down to refresh
14 sats \ 8 replies \ @DarthCoin OP 17 Sep \ parent \ on: Connections with James Burke | documentary trailer 🎥 science
Don't you think that the producers of this show, are trying to manipulate the viewer perception about how things were created? Like some kind of "controlled prediction".
Each end of the episode end up with a punch line that gives the impression of "you see. it happen like that because we say so..."
This brings (again) to my mind a simple question: WHY WE KNOW WHAT WE KNOW? Not because somebody else is "telling" us that things are like that and not like the other way?
reply
episode 2, min 42... for example, subtly they insert this phrase... refering in fact to so called "covid vaccines" that are instead graphene nano-circuits, to control full human body.
reply
graphene nano-circuits, to control full human body.
FYI, graphene oxide is not a superconductor, contrary to what is claimed in the video. If it were, this would be Nobel prize level discovery. Twisted bilayer graphene at a very specific twist angle can be, but under conditions that cannot be achieved at room temperature in the human body.
Matching Raman peak is probably just related to a standard carbon bond frequency. Organic compounds all have such bonds, not just graphene.
Not sure what those self-replicating properties are, especially in the context of graphene.
reply
Did you ever look into a microscope of a so called "vaccine" ? I doubt it.
https://www.laquintacolumna.info/translations/there-is-no-mrna-in-vaccines-there-is-no-spike-protein/
reply
Oh, I am not commenting on the vaccine.
I am just highlighting the inaccuracies regarding the claims he makes about graphene. I know more about graphene than I know about vaccines.
reply
there are many types of graphene and you know that.
reply
Indeed. Yet, graphene oxide is not a superconductor. And the Raman peaks are not conclusive evidence for the existence of graphene in those samples. A. Ferrari mentioned in the video would confirm that.
reply
nooo why delete that link? nothing wrong with it. Was just an observation with those punch lines.
reply