31 sats \ 0 replies \ @petertodd 15 Sep
Bitcoin fixes this.
The listeners can simply pay real sats to the artists directly with lightning.
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @jackmo2341 15 Sep
I’m genuinely confused about how this is fraud. If he generated the songs and the he’s paying bots to listen to them, who is he stealing money from? Maybe Spotify has a no bot policy, but is breaking TOS the same as fraud?
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @ChrisS 16 Sep
Depends who you steal from and who they know and how much you steal.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @160ed04091 15 Sep
is just impressive that With advancements in AI, it’s now possible to create music using algorithms and machine learning models.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @Malachi17 15 Sep
Manipulating the streaming data is the clear no-no here. The rest seems like normal radio operating procedure except you are using AI instead of artists, but then, as I said...
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @cooder 16 Sep
Thousands of other "musicians"...
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @jgbtc 16 Sep
The author of that article must have gotten paid a bonus for every time they used the words "fraud" or "fraudulently".
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @bitalion 16 Sep
Artificial intelligence is a useful tool, but in this area there is still much to be defined. In the case of generating source code, there are already many projects that will not allow contributions that have been generated with AI, but in the case of music, we would have to see.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @lv99slacker OP 15 Sep
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @lv99slacker OP 15 Sep
reply