Did you know how they enslaved the whole world population? Did you know that you are declared DEAD body right after you are REGISTERED at birth?

A Cestui Que Vie Trust, also known by several other pseudonyms such as “Term of Life or Years” or “Pur Autre Vie” or "Fide Commissary Trust" or “Foreign Situs Trust” or “Secret Trust” is a pseudo form of trust first formed in the 16th Century under Henry VIII of England on one or more presumptions including (but not limited to) one or more Persons presumed wards, infants, idiots, lost or abandoned at “sea” and therefore assumed/presumed “dead” after seven (7) years. Additional presumptions by which such a Trust may be “legally” formed were added in later statutes to include bankruptcy, incapacity, mortgages and private companies.

In terms of the evidential history of the formation of Cestui Que Vie Trusts:

(i) The first Cestui Que Vie Trusts formed were through an Act of Henry VIII of England in 1540 (32Hen.8 c1) and later wholly corrupted whereby the poor people of England, after having all their homes, goods and wealth seized in 1535 (27Hen.8 c.28) under the “guise” of small religious estates under £200, were granted the welfare or “commonwealth” benefit of an Cestui Que Use or simply an “estate” with which to live, to work and to bequeath via a written will; and

(ii) In 1666 Westminster and the ruling classes passed the infamous “Proof of Life Act” also called the Cestui Que Vie Act (19Car.2 c.6) whereby the poor and disenfranchised that had not “proven” to Westminster and the Courts they were alive, were henceforth to be declared “dead in law” and therefore lost, abandoned and their property to be managed in their absence. This supremely morally repugnant act, which remains in force today, is the birth of Mundi and the infamous occult rituals of the British Courts in the wearing of black robes and other paraphernalia in honoring the “dead”; and

(iii) In 1707 Westminster under Queen Anne (6Ann c.18) extended the provisions of “Proof of Life” and Cestui Que Vie, extending the use of such structures ultimately for corporate and other franchise purposes. This wicked, profane and completely sacrilegious act in direct defiance to all forms of Christian morals and Rule of Law has remained a cornerstone of global banking and financial control to the 21st Century; and

(iv) In 1796, King George III (36 Geo.3. c.52 §20) duty was applied to Estates Pur Autre Vie for the first time; and

(v) In 1837 (1 Vict. c.26) and the amendments to the nature of Wills, that if a person under an Estate Pur Autre Vie (Cestui Que Vie) did not make a proper will, then such property would be granted to the executors and administrators.

In terms of the evidential history of the operation and any form of relief or remedy associated with Cestui Que Vie Trusts, taking into account all Statutes referencing Cestui Que Vie prior to 1540 are a deliberate fraud and proof of the illegitimacy of Westminster Statutes:

(i) The “first” Act outlining Cestui Que (Vie) Trusts is deliberately hidden under the claimed statutes of the reign of King Richard III in 1483 (1Rich.3 c.1) whereby the act (still in force) states that all conveyances and transfers and use of property is good, even though a purchaser may be unaware it is effectively under “cestui que use” (subject to a Cestui Que Vie Trust). The act also gives a vague and challenge path of relief that if one is of complete mind, not an infant and not under financial duress then any property under Cestui Que Vie Trusts is rightfully theirs for use; and

(ii) The “second” Act outlining Cestui Que (Vie) Trusts is deliberately hidden under the reign of Henry 7th in 1488 (4Hen.7 c.17) permitted lords to render any attempt by people classed as “wards” to demonstrate their freedom useless and that such lords may use writs and other devices to “force” such people back to being compliant “wards” (poor slaves). The only remedy under this act was if a ward demonstrated the waste of the lord as to the property (and energy) seized from the poor (ignorant white slaves); and

(iii) The “third” Act outlining the operation of Cestui Que Vie only hidden this time as Estate Pur Autre Vie was in 1741 under 14Geo.2 c.20) whereby one who was knowledgeable of the Cestui Que Vie slavery system could between the ages of 18 to 20, seek to recover such property under Cestui Que Vie and cease to be a slave. However, the same act made law that after 20 years, the remedy for such recovery was no longer available, despite the fact that the existence of Cestui Que Vie Trusts is denied and Westminster and Banks are sworn to lie, obstruct, hide at all cost the existence of the foundations of global banking slavery.

In terms of essential elements concerning Cestui Que Vie Trusts:

(i) A Cestui Que (Vie) Trust may only exist for seventy (70) years being the traditional accepted "life" expectancy of the estate; and

(ii) A Beneficiary under Estate may be either a Beneficiary or a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust. When a Beneficiary loses direct benefit of any Property of the higher Estate placed in Cestui Que (Vie) Trust on their behalf, they do not “own” the Cestui Que (Vie) Trust and are only the beneficiary of what the Trustees of the Cestui Que (Vie) Trust choose to provide them; and

(iii) The original purpose and function of a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust was to form a temporary Estate for the benefit of another because some event, state of affairs or condition prevented them from claiming their status as living, competent and present before a competent authority. Therefore, any claims, history, statutes or arguments that deviate in terms of the origin and function of a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust as pronounced by these canons is false and automatically null and void.

The Trust Corpus created by a Cestui Que (Vie) is also known as the Estate from two Latin words e+statuo literally meaning “by virtue of decree, statute or judgment”. However, as the Estate is held in a Temporary not permanent Trust, the (Corporate) Person as Beneficiary is entitled only to equitable title and the use of the Property, rather than legal title and therefore ownership of the Property. Only the Corporation, also known as Body Corporate, Estate and Trust Corpus of a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust possesses valid legal personality.

The Property of any Estate created through a Temporary (Testamentary) Trust may be regarded as under “Cestui Que Use” by the Corporate Person, even if another name or description is used to define the type of trust or use. Therefore “Cestui Que Use is not a Person but a Right and therefore a form of "property".

In 1534, prior to the 1st Cestui Que Vie Act (1540), Henry VIII declared the first Cestui Que Vie type estate with the Act of Supremecy which created the Crown Estate. In 1604, seventy (70) years later, James I of England modified the estate as the Crown Union (Union of Crowns). By the 18th Century, the Crown was viewed as a company. However by the start of the 19th Century around 1814 onwards upon the bankruptcy of the company (1814/15) , it became the fully private Crown Corporation controlled by European private banker families.

Since 1581, there has been a second series of Cestui Que Vie Estates concerning the property of "persons" and rights which migrated to the United States for administration including:

(i) In 1651 the Act for the Settlement of Ireland 1651-52 which introduced the concept of "settlements", enemies of the state and restrictions of movement in states of "emergency"; and

(ii) In 1861 the Emergency Powers Act 1861; and

(iii) In 1931 the Emergency Relief and Construction Act 1931-32; and

(iv) in 2001 the Patriot Act 2001.

Since 1591, there has been a third series of Cestui Que Vie Estates concerning the property of "soul" and ecclesiastical rights which migrated to the United States for administration including:

(i) In 1661 the Act of Settlement 1661-62; and

(ii) In 1871 the District of Columbia Act 1871; and

(iii) In 1941 the Lend Lease Act 1941.

By 1815 and the bankruptcy of the Crown and Bank of England by the Rothschilds, for the 1st time, the Cestui Que Vie Trusts of the United Kingdom became assets placed in private banks effectively becoming "private trusts" or "Fide Commissary Trusts" administered by commissioners (guardians). From 1835 and the Wills Act, these private trusts have been also considered "Secret Trusts" whose existence does not need to be divulged.

From 1917/18 with the enactment of the Sedition Act and the Trading with the Enemy Act in the United States and through the United Kingdom, the citizens of the Commonwealth and the United States became effectively "enemies of the state" and "aliens" which in turn converted the "Fide Commissary" private secret trusts to "Foreign Situs" (Private International) Trusts.

In 1931, the Roman Cult, also known as the Vatican created the Bank for International Settlements for the control of claimed property of associated private central banks around the world. Upon the deliberate bankruptcy of most countries, private central banks were installed as administrators and the global Cestui Que Vie/Foreign Situs Trust system was implemented from 1933 onwards.

Since 1933, when a child is borne in a State(Estate) under inferior Roman law, three (3) Cestui Que (Vie) Trusts are created upon certain presumptions, specifically designed to deny the child forever any rights of Real Property, any Rights as a Free Person and any Rights to be known as man and woman rather than a creature or animal, by claiming and possessing their Soul or Spirit.

Since 1933, upon a new child being borne, the Executors or Administrators of the higher Estate willingly and knowingly convey the beneficial entitlements of the child as Beneficiary into the 1st Cestui Que(Vie) Trust in the form of a Registry Number by registering the Name, thereby also creating the Corporate Person and denying the child any rights as an owner of Real Property.

Since 1933, when a child is borne, the Executors or Administrators of the higher Estate knowingly and willingly claim the baby as chattel to the Estate. The slave baby contract is then created by honoring the ancient tradition of either having the ink impression of the feet of the baby onto the live birth record, or a drop of its blood as well as tricking the parents to signing the baby away through the deceitful legal meanings on the live birth record. This live birth record as a promissory note is converted into a slave bond sold to the private reserve bank of the estate and then conveyed into a 2nd and separate Cestui Que (Vie) Trust per child owned by the bank. Upon the promissory note reaching maturity and the bank being unable to “seize” the slave child, a maritime lien is lawfully issued to “salvage” the lost property and itself monetized as currency issued in series against the Cestui Que (Vie) Trust.

Each Cestui Que Vie Trust created since 1933 represents one of the 3 Crowns representing the 3 claims of property of the Roman Cult, being Real Property, Personal Property and Ecclesiastical Property and the denial of any rights to men and women, other than those chosen as loyal members of the society and as Executors and Administrators.

The Three (3) Cestui Que Vie Trusts are the specific denial of rights of Real Property, Personal Property and Ecclesiastical Property for most men and women, corresponds exactly to the three forms of law available to the Galla of the Bar Association Courts. The first form of law is corporate commercial law is effective because of the 1st Cestui Que Vie Trust. The second form of law is maritime and trust law is effective because of the 2nd Cestui Que Vie Trust. The 3rd form of law is Talmudic and Roman Cult law is effective because of the 3rd Cestui Que Vie Trust of Baptism.

The Birth Certificate issued under Roman Law represents the modern equivalent to the Settlement Certificates of the 17th century and signifies the holder as a pauper and effectively a Roman Slave. The Birth Certificate has no direct relationship to the private secret trusts controlled by the private banking network, nor can it be used to force the administration of a state or nation to divulge the existence of these secret trusts.

As the Cestui Que Vie Trusts are created as private secret trusts on multiple presumptions including the ongoing bankruptcy of certain national estates, they remain the claimed private property of the Roman Cult banks and therefore cannot be directly claimed or used.

While the private secret trusts of the private central banks cannot be directly addressed, they are still formed on certain presumptions of law including claimed ownership of the name, the body, the mind and soul of infants, men and women. Each and every man and woman has the absolute right to rebuke and reject such false presumptions as a member of One Heaven and holder of their own title.

Given the private secret trusts of the private central banks are created on false presumptions, when a man or woman makes clear their Live Borne Record and claim over their own name, body, mind and soul, any such trust based on such false presumptions ceases to have any property.

Any Administrator or Executor that refuses to immediately dissolve a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust, upon a Person establishing their status and competency, is guilty of fraud and fundamental breach of their fiduciary duties requiring their immediate removal and punishment.

A Mortgage is a formal written Instrument where A. (the Mortgagor) as Assignor temporarily assigns certain Rights in Trust to some specific Certificate of Title in Real or Personal Property to B. (the Mortgagee) as Trustee, as Security for a sum secured (Mortgage Debt) and the agreed performance of obligations or payment of money to C. (the Lender; or the Seller; or the Holder). A Mortgage of Personal Property is a Bill of Sale.

The Certificate of Title in Real or Personal Property used as Security within a valid Mortgage Instrument is some valid Title of Interest, Use or Ownership recorded in a formal Roll or Register that is commonly accepted, or defensible or provable within the relevant jurisdiction. Examples of Certificates of Title used as Security within a Mortgage include (but are not limited to):

(i) Certificate of Title to Land as “freehold” such as Fee Simple, or Fee Tail; or “leasehold” such as Copyhold (formerly Tenancy at Will), or Estate for Years or Estate for Life; or

(ii) Certificate of Title to Land Related Rights such as Water Rights, Mineral Rights, Easement, Timber Rights, Farming Rights, Grazing Rights, Hunting Rights, Air Rights, Development or Subdivision Rights; or

(iii) Certificate of Title to Personal Property such as Motor Vehicle, Luxury Goods, Valuables and Collectibles or Appliances; or

(iv) Certificate of Title to Lease, or Higher Purchase Agreement, or Contract, or Promissory Note; or

(v) Certificate of Title to Securities such as Stocks, Bonds, Debentures or Loans.

A valid Mortgage by definition is a Trust by Agreement of Assignment whereby the Mortgagor (Assignor) possesses the Right to redeem the Property upon the fulfilment of the terms of the Agreement. Therefore:

(i) Any Instrument or arrangement that claims or purports or infers itself to be a Mortgage that is not a Trust, is a clear example of deceptive and misleading conduct, rendering any and all obligations null and void, with all liability upon the one culpable of such deceptive and misleading conduct; and

(ii) Any Instrument or arrangement that claims or purports or infers itself to be a Mortgage that lists the Mortgagor as a Grantor or Giftor is clearly deceptive and misleading and contrary to the function and nature of a valid Mortgage which must be by Assignment for the Mortgagor to possess any right of redemption and reconveyance of ownership; and

(iii) The core agreement of a Mortgage is between the Mortgagor as Assignor to the Mortgagee as Trustee. If such agreement is not done in good faith, with clean hands and without prejudice, then no valid Mortgage exists and all liability rests upon the imposter Trustee (de son tort); and

(iv) If the Mortgagee fails to properly identify himself, or the Trust, then such action nullifies any effective agreement or enforceability under true law; and

(v) If the Mortgagee fails to give a valid oath to act in fiduciary capacity as Trustee, then no Trust exists and no valid Mortgage exists and all conveyances and transfers must by definition be without lawful effect, with all such rights and title remaining with the Assignor.

The most common forms of Mortgages are:

(i) Stock Mortgage is where C. (the Seller) sells a sum of stock and then advances the proceeds to A. (the Buyer; and the Mortgagor), who then covenants to replace the stock (i.e. to purchase and transfer to C. a like amount of stock) at a future time, and executes a mortgage of Title in Real Property to B. (the Mortgagee) as security for the covenant; and

(ii) Legal Mortgage is where A. (the Mortgagor) conveys Real Property to B. (the Mortgagee; and Trustee) by Deed, as a security for the scheduled repayments of money to C. (the Lender; or the Seller; or the Holder); and

(iii) Equitable Mortgage is where A. (the Mortgagor) conveys Personal Property in the form of a Lien upon a Lease to B. (the Mortgagee; and Trustee), as a security for the scheduled repayments of money to C. (the Lender; or the Seller; or the Holder). An Equitable Mortgage will normally be upheld by a court of equity, despite the fact it is wanting and lacking in essential features of a Legal Mortgage (i.e. the existence of valid Title).

In respect of the Mortgagee:

(i) By the very nature of what normally constitutes a valid Mortgage, the Mortgagee (the Trustee) is a Trustee of a valid Trust formed under Oath into which the Real or Personal Property used as Security is conveyed. A failure of Oath, or Disclosure, or Fiduciary Capacity automatically renders such Trust dissolved, with full liability for the Mortgage Debt with the Trustee de son tort and all Rights returned to the Assignor; and

(ii) As any valid conveyance of Real or Personal Property within a Mortgage must by definition be temporary and therefore an Assignment, the Mortgagee as Trustee remains obligated for the duration of the Mortgage to provide full notice and disclosure and property accounting to the Mortgagor as Assignor. The failure of the Mortgagee as Trustee in their fiduciary capacity renders the Mortgagor (Assignor) free from liability as well as the Beneficiary free from any liability, with all liability upon the Mortgagee as Trustee de son tort; and

(iii) It is the Mortgagee and not the Lender who is obligated under fiduciary capacity to give notice and proper accounting to the Beneficiary of the Mortgage Trust, not the Lender. Nor may a Mortgagee appoint the Lender their agent without committing a deliberately deceptive and misleading act that is not at arms length and therefore without force or effect; and

(iv) The Mortgagee (Trustee) has the right after the lapse of a certain time and clear default of the Mortgagor (Assignor) in performance, of enforcing his security, or making it available in obtaining payment of the money advanced; and

(v) If the Mortgage is itself a negotiable security whereby the rights to part or all of the repayment income may be sold in exchange for an amount equivalent to part or a multiple of the value of the Mortgage Debt, then the Mortgagee (Trustee) is obligated under fiduciary duties to give due notice to the Mortgagor, even if such terms are absent in the Deed or agreement. The failure of the Mortgagee upon receiving money against a Mortgage to pay down the Mortgage Debt is a fraud, collapsing the Trust and placing full liability on the Trustee de son tort.

In respect of the Mortgagor:

(i) By the very nature of what normally constitutes a valid Mortgage, the Mortgagor (the Assignor) is free from any direct liability in respect of the sum secured (Mortgage Debt), precisely because their conveyance of Rights as Mortgagor to the Mortgagee (the Trustee) secures it. Any instrument that then seeks to place liability of the sum secured upon the party claimed as Mortgagor is a fundamentally flawed document having no effect; and

(ii) The Mortgagor (the Assignor) may also be the Beneficiary of the Temporary Trust formed under the valid Mortgage; and

(iii) The Mortgagor is obliged to perform certain actions, as prescribed by the formal Deed of Mortgage, signed, sealed and executed – normally in the scheduled payments of money. The failure of the Mortgagor to perform the agreed obligations may place them in default; and

(iv) A condition of any valid Mortgage is the Right of Redemption whereby if the Mortgagor negotiates to pay off the Mortgage Debt or Charge upon the Property, he buys it back and therefore is entitled to have it reconveyed to him without encumbrance by the Mortgagee (or Creditor). If the Mortgagee refuses, then the Mortgagor may bring an action or suit of redemption to compel the Mortgagee to reconvey the property on payment of the debt and interest; and

(v) If a Mortgage has been structured as a negotiable security, then the Mortgagor is entitled to offer a negotiable settlement to the Mortgagee (Trustee), particularly upon evidence of failure of fiduciary duties, failure of accounting and failure of disclosure. As a negotiable security, the Mortgagee (Trustee) is obliged to negotiate in good faith as to the negotiated pay off to enable the Mortgagee to have his property reconveyed back to him.

In respect of the Lender of the secured sum (Mortgage Debt):

(i) The Lender may or may not also be the Mortgagee (Trustee). Usually under Legal Mortgages and Equitable Mortgages the Mortgagee (Trustee) is separate and usually a member of a private bar association; and

(ii) If the Lender and Mortgagee (Trustee) are separate, then the primary obligation of performance in respect of securing the Mortgage Debt is with the Mortgagee (Trustee) by definition and not the Mortgagor. Therefore, any notices, demands or letters from the Lender to the Mortgagor making such demands or threats is a fundamental breach and fault of the nature of a valid Mortgage rendering such an agreement null. If the agreement is not a Mortgage and purporting to be a Mortgage then it is deceptive and misleading conduct and also null and void of any effect in law; and

(iii) If the Lender by nature has their advance secured by the Mortgage, then any additional demand, contract or agreement that seeks further monies, or promises from the Mortgagor above the performance of repayment under the Mortgage Deed and to the exclusion of the Mortgagee (Trustee) is by definition unjust enrichment and contrary to a valid and competent system of law and justice; and

(iv) The Lender and Mortgagee cannot under any sense of valid law and morality enter into a conspiracy to defraud, or mislead or withhold from the Mortgagor (Assignor) or Beneficiary any additional agreements, undertakings, payments between the parties without defaulting upon the contractual aspects of the agreement, collapsing the trust and accepting full liability themselves; and

(v) If a Lender sells a Mortgage as a negotiable security to another party and no longer has an interest, then such a Lender no longer has an interest and cannot be considered an interested party in any action of foreclosure or redemption.

Where a Mortgage is an Equitable Mortgage and therefore a security against a Lease, it is the obligation of all parties associated with the preparation of the Mortgage for the Mortgagor (as Assignor) to be made aware that the Security is a Lease and not a Certificate of Title to Land as “freehold” such as Fee Simple, or Fee Tail; or “leasehold” such as Copyhold (formerly Tenancy at Will), or Estate for Years or Estate for Life:

(i) If no Certificate of Title to Land is registered in accord with the Statutes of Land Title Registration of the State, or Nation then there is no Record of Title; and

(ii) While a County, or State may permit under its regulations the registration of Certificates with Title Companies, this may not be the same as the official registration of a Certificate of Title to Land with the State or Nation. Instead, it may be a private registration, deliberately misleading and deceptive in claiming to be a valid public registration when it may not be under statute and public law; and

(iii) The failure of the Mortgagee (as Trustee) to provide a clearly identified lease document, or to render such document clear as a lease and not a Title to Land, renders such agreement null and void and instead causes the possession to revert to a direct “freehold” between the Beneficiary and the County, or State or Nation in the absence of a valid tenancy enforced by the County, or State or Nation; and

(iv) In an Equitable Mortgage whereby the Security is a lease held and registered by the Mortgagee (as Trustee), the Mortgagee becomes the landlord and liable for property taxes and obligations to the upkeep and maintenance of the property.

Any inferior Roman court that openly permits the unrepaired and open fraud of Trust Law, Estate Law and the law of Wills by refusing to repudiate any financial institution as Lender or attorney as Mortgagee that monetizes or multiplies the sale of a loan without consent or remedy to the borrower openly consents that the whole system of Roman Trust Law, Estate Law and Wills no longer applies and is null and void.

By definition, any Property taxes charged by the higher estate to the tenant are the direct responsibility of the landlord. Where a court seeks to foreclose on a property against the Mortgagor as the tenant and not the Mortgagee (usually a member of the private bar associations) as Trustee de son tort, constitutes a gross fraud and if unrepaired is an open consent that Roman Trust Law, Estate Law and Contract Law no longer applies and is null and void.

Any Promissory Note and Application Form signed by a Lender and Mortgagor as part of a Mortgage is material to the Agreement. Therefore, they must be producible in any action of foreclosure or such an action must be struck out.

A Mortgage in fraud means no real or personal property is held in security. A deed not executed and closed in good faith is wanting and therefore null, having no effect and no property has been conveyed.