One gets the impression that he also doesn't zap things once they already have other zaps on them. It would be as if he thought those zaps were somehow tainted by the filthy zaps that came before them. If that's the case, it's a loophole in the system and could be addressed. He might be seeing valuable content and restraining because it has already been zapped and it would pull his ranking. Early zapping seems like a good incentive, but not at the cost of quality zapping.
Moreover, he may be a wizard. The profile picture looks like a wizard. If so, that would be something that the algorithm unfortunately wouldn't be able to address. This is because wizards use magic. They do so with spells and enchantments, which are not typically open source.
I hadn't considered the purity angle. Whatever your reasons, they're serving you well.
reply
160 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 12 Sep
restraining because it has already been zapped and it would pull his ranking
Your ranking doesn't decrease by zapping late, but late zaps do give you less rank per sat.
reply
No, wizards are bots and bots are wizards here. Not a believer in them. You seemed like a real guy, that's why you weren't being downzapped. I was excited to know how this early zapping can favour anyone on the leaderboard. Anyways, keep doing what you're doing. As I know it's self correcting, so unless ypu provide value with your content, it won't be long when you see yourself very low on the table.
reply
I think that's about it too. Not zapping 'contaminated' items makes sure we're at the base of the graph. I'm not a believer in wizards, but I guess there might be some out there!
reply