pull down to refresh

It's just happening for more than 2 days now.
šŸ‘€
I don't just understand how a random stacker with a zap of 500 sats without a single comment and with a post that did not gather any attention provide more value than the stackers Who are whose comments and posts are their in the top of zaprank.
Maybe we're biased too much towards early (big) zaps.
Also, the trust score that you mentioned here confuses me when I look into this stacker's bio. He only has 10 items and not joined too long ago. His 10 items have hardly got him 1000 sats.
Trust score is not based on what someone posts but on what they zap since their zaps influence ranking of other posts and you can't see their zaps.
So this means in theory, you could post really bad stuff but if you zap consistently good stuff (the stuff that other stackers also zap after you), you would have a high trust score.
In practice, they should learn that their posts don't perform and only lose them sats.
Can we or you see the trust score of stackers?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 7 Sep
I can, you can't (but I don't)
reply